Special Master scorecard

Live · 13,358 cases in database · latest filing 2026-05-12

Outcome, award and timing statistics for every special master in the registry, computed directly from the decisions in this database. Use the condition filter to compare like with like: a docket heavy in SIRVA settlements will always show a higher win rate than one heavy in contested encephalopathy claims, so the headline win rate mostly reflects case mix. The contested win rate column counts only reasoned decisions, where a Special Master actually ruled on entitlement.

Special Masters shown
6
with at least 5 cases for Dysautonomia / POTS claims
Petitioner win rate
6%
78 decided cases
Median award
$40K
5 compensated cases
Median time to decision
27 mo
76 dated cases

Special Master scorecard

Special MasterCasesWin rateContested win rate (n)Settled shareMedian awardMedian timeMost common condition
Brian H. Corcoran290%0% (12)——9 moDysautonomia / POTS
Nora Beth Dorsey1040%n=4100%$32K34 moDysautonomia / POTS
Daniel T. Horner90%0% (6)——38 moDysautonomia / POTS
Christian J. Moran812%0% (5)100%$85K45 moDysautonomia / POTS
Mindy Michaels Roth60%n=1——21 moDysautonomia / POTS
Thomas L. Gowen60%n=1——23 moDysautonomia / POTS
Petitioner win rate, 6 highest-volume special masters for Dysautonomia / POTS claims
Share of decided cases (compensated or entitlement granted) among compensated, entitlement, denied and dismissed.
Median award for Dysautonomia / POTS claims
Compensated cases with a recorded award, fee-only awards excluded.
Median months from filing to decision for Dysautonomia / POTS claims
Cases with both a filing date and a decision date.

What a Special Master's numbers do and do not tell you

Special Masters in the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims decide Vaccine Injury Compensation Program petitions without a jury and under a relaxed evidentiary standard. Cases are assigned administratively, and since 2017 most shoulder-injury (SIRVA) petitions have been routed to a dedicated docket, which is why one Chief Special Master appears on roughly half of all decisions in this registry and why raw win rates differ so sharply between judges. A high overall win rate mostly means a docket full of Table claims that the government concedes or settles.

The measure that actually compares judges is the contested win rate: the share of reasoned entitlement decisions in which the petitioner prevailed. Even that is confounded by which conditions and which theories reach a hearing in front of each Special Master. Read the two columns together, use the condition filter, and open the individual hub page for the decisions themselves before drawing a conclusion about any one adjudicator.

How to read this. Win rate = compensated or entitlement-granted cases divided by all decided cases (compensated, entitlement granted, denied, dismissed). Dismissals include voluntary withdrawals. Settled share = wins resolved by stipulation or proffer rather than a ruling. Median award uses compensated cases with a recorded dollar award and excludes attorney-fee-only awards. Fields were extracted from the public decisions by an AI pipeline and spot-checked; individual values can be wrong, aggregates are robust. Cases before 2014 are sparse in this corpus.