The Vaccine Injury Table — and why it splits the rates

The compensation rates on this page split sharply into two regimes. Conditions on the HHS Vaccine Injury Table compensate at high rates because they qualify for the Table presumption: if the petitioner shows the injury matches the Table criteria within the prescribed onset window (and there's no alternative cause), causation is presumed and the petitioner does not have to prove the vaccine caused the injury.

Off-Table conditions require proof of causation under the three-prong test set in Althen v. HHS, 418 F.3d 1274 (Fed. Cir. 2005):

(1) a medical theory causally connecting the vaccination and the injury; (2) a logical sequence of cause and effect showing that the vaccination was the reason for the injury; and (3) a showing of a proximate temporal relationship between vaccination and injury.— Althen v. HHS, 418 F.3d 1274, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2005)

In practice, contested off-Table causation cases compensate at roughly half the rate of Table claims. The data below ranks every condition tracked in this registry by compensation rate — top to bottom, 90% (SIRVA (shoulder injury related to vaccine administration)) down to 0% (Childhood disintegrative disorder).

Developmental delay / regression

Cases
40
Comp rate
22%
Compensated
9
Total paid
$5.2M
22% compensated

Developmental delay or regression is a non-Table condition that overlaps substantially with both encephalopathy and autism-spectrum claims. Many pediatric cases tagged developmental-delay in this registry allege cognitive or motor regression following vaccination, often with a documented encephalopathic event.

Largest compensated developmental-delay cases

Browse all 40 developmental delay cases

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)

Cases
2,204
Comp rate
84%
Compensated
1,844
Total paid
$402.0M
84% compensated

GBS is an acute polyneuropathy in which the body's immune system attacks peripheral nerves. GBS following a flu shot was added to the Vaccine Injury Table in 2017 alongside SIRVA. The historical association between GBS and influenza vaccines dates to the 1976 swine flu vaccine campaign, in which GBS rates were elevated above background. Modern flu vaccines show a much smaller signal, but the Table presumption applies regardless.

Browse all 2,204 gbs cases

Encephalopathy / encephalitis

Cases
325
Comp rate
51%
Compensated
166
Total paid
$75.1M
51% compensated

Vaccine encephalopathy is the original injury class that motivated the VICP. The 1980s wave of DPT-vaccine brain-injury lawsuits — and the resulting near-collapse of the U.S. childhood vaccine supply — led Congress to pass the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which established the no-fault VICP.

Encephalopathy following DPT (and its successor DTaP) is Table-listed with strict criteria: "acute encephalopathy" onset within 72 hours of vaccination, severe enough to require hospitalization, and resulting in a "chronic encephalopathy" persisting more than six months. The 51% compensation rate reflects the strictness of those thresholds — many petitions allege encephalopathy that doesn't meet them. Off-Table encephalopathy claims must be argued under Althen.

Largest compensated encephalopathy cases on file

Browse all 325 encephalopathy / encephalitis cases

SIRVA — shoulder injury after vaccination

Cases
6,248
Comp rate
90%
Compensated
5,644
Total paid
$435.0M
90% compensated

Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) is the highest-volume and highest-compensation-rate condition in the registry. SIRVA was added to the Vaccine Injury Table on March 21, 2017; before then, shoulder injuries from vaccinations had to be argued under Althen. The Table addition created the sharp inflection visible in the filings timeline.

The Table criteria require: pain in the shoulder of injection within 48 hours; pain limited to the shoulder; no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction in the affected shoulder before vaccination; and no alternative cause explaining the injury. Cases that fit those criteria compensate at roughly 90%.

Browse all 6,248 sirva cases

Autism spectrum disorder

Cases
89
Comp rate
7%
Compensated
6
Total paid
$165K
7% compensated

Autism-spectrum petitions have the lowest compensation rate of any condition tracked in this registry. The rate reflects how the program has historically adjudicated autism-causation theories under the Althen standard — not a medical judgment about whether vaccines and autism are causally related in the general population.

The Omnibus Autism Proceedings (2002–2010)

Between 2002 and 2010, the Office of Special Masters consolidated more than 5,000 autism-related petitions into the Omnibus Autism Proceedings (OAP). Three test cases reviewed two general theories: (1) MMR plus thimerosal-containing vaccines causing autism, and (2) thimerosal alone causing autism. Both theories were rejected. The test cases — Cedillo v. HHS, Snyder v. HHS, and Hazlehurst v. HHS — were appealed; the Federal Circuit affirmed the denials. Subsequent autism-only petitions are routinely denied with citation to OAP precedent.

The Poling concession (2008)

The government concession in the 2008 case of Hannah Poling acknowledged that nine simultaneous vaccinations "significantly aggravated" a documented underlying mitochondrial disorder, resulting in an encephalopathy with autism-spectrum features. Because the case was resolved by concession rather than a contested Special Master decision, no published opinion exists in the GovInfo corpus this registry pulls from. — Source: HHS concession; case settled before published decision

The Office of Special Masters has subsequently and repeatedly distinguished Poling from the OAP holdings: Poling involved a documented pre-existing condition and a government concession; OAP reviewed a general causal theory and rejected it.

The closest in-corpus analog to the Poling pattern that was contested through to a published decision is A.H.T. v. HHS (2017), which alleged "mitochondrial disorder aggravated by vaccination, leading to encephalopathic event." That petition was denied.

Compensated autism-spectrum cases in this registry

The 6 compensated cases in the autism-spectrum bucket are listed below. Their alleged-condition fields show that most are mixed presentations — encephalopathy or developmental regression with autism-spectrum features — rather than autism in isolation:

In October 2025, KFF Health News reported on a Trump administration proposal by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to add autism to the Vaccine Injury Table. If enacted, that would shift autism claims from the Althen regime to the Table presumption regime — fundamentally changing the compensation calculus for this condition. As of this page's last data refresh, no such Table revision has been finalized.

Browse all 89 autism-spectrum cases

Neurological issues — across the registry

The VICP doesn't track "neurological injury" as a single category. The relevant clinical conditions tracked separately above are encephalopathy/encephalitis, seizure disorder, developmental delay/regression, and autism-spectrum disorder. Together they represent the registry's neurological-injury surface area:

Cases
637
Comp rate
36%
Compensated
231
Total paid
$101.3M

Compensation rates compared across these four conditions:

Encephalopathy / encephalitis (325)
51%
 
Seizure disorder (183)
27%
 
Developmental delay / regression (40)
22%
 
Autism spectrum disorder (89)
7%
 

The encephalopathy hub is the closest single taxonomic match to "vaccine-related neurological injury."

Seizure disorder

Cases
183
Comp rate
27%
Compensated
50
Total paid
$20.8M
27% compensated

Residual seizure disorder is Table-listed for DTaP and certain other vaccines when it presents as part of an acute encephalopathy. Off-Table seizure claims require Althen-style proof of causation. Many DTaP-era pediatric cases in the registry involve infants who developed first-time seizures within 72 hours of vaccination and went on to chronic seizure disorders.

Largest compensated seizure cases

Browse all 183 seizure disorder cases

Pediatric vs. adult compensation rates

The same legal label (e.g. "transverse myelitis," "GBS") doesn't always compensate at the same rate across age cohorts. This is partly mechanical — a pediatric DTaP encephalopathy fits the Vaccine Injury Table presumption while an adult HPV-era encephalopathy is decided under Althen — and partly evidentiary: pediatric petitions often arrive with documented well-baby-visit timelines, while adult onset can be harder to anchor.

Pediatric (under 18) Adult (18+)
Condition
Kids (under 18)
Adults (18+)
Gap
Anaphylaxis
12 total
50%
17%
+33 pt
Brachial neuritis
43 total
83%
51%
+32 pt
SIRVA
1,293 total
65%
82%
-17 pt
Syncope
32 total
68%
69%
-1 pt
What the gap tells you

Across the 7 conditions with comparable case volume in both cohorts: pediatric petitions compensate at 58% (288 of 500) vs. adult petitions at 75% (1,296 of 1,725).

Transverse myelitis shows the widest gap: 68% pediatric vs. 28% adult (a 40-point spread).

Conditions where one cohort had fewer than 5 cases were excluded so the side-by-side comparison stays statistically meaningful.

Death cases

Cases
148
Comp rate
24%
Compensated
35
Total paid
$7.1M
24% compensated

Death cases follow a different settlement framework than injury cases. Wrongful-death awards under the Vaccine Act are statutorily capped at $250,000, plus pain-and-suffering and reasonable funeral expenses. The full demographics — children vs. adults, by-vaccine distribution, and age-at-vaccination concentration — are on the dedicated death-cases page.

View the death-cases breakdown

Frequently asked questions about the VICP

General questions about the U.S. Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

What is the VICP?
The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) is a federal no-fault compensation program for individuals who allege injury from vaccines listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. It was established by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and is administered jointly by HHS, the Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Petitions are decided by Special Masters in lieu of traditional civil litigation.
What is the Althen test?
Althen v. HHS, 418 F.3d 1274 (Fed. Cir. 2005) is the controlling precedent for off-Table causation in the VICP. To prevail on a non-Table claim a petitioner must show: (1) a medical theory causally connecting the vaccination and the injury; (2) a logical sequence of cause and effect showing the vaccination was the reason for the injury; and (3) a proximate temporal relationship between the vaccination and the injury.
What is the average VICP award?
The median compensation award in VICP is approximately $80,000; the mean is approximately $130,000 because of a long right-tail of catastrophic-injury and death-of-petitioner cases that compensate in the millions. As of the most recent corpus refresh, the program has paid approximately $1.19 billion to 9,200+ compensated petitioners.
How long does a VICP case take?
Median time from filing to final judgment in the VICP is approximately 21 months; mean is approximately 26 months. Compensated cases tend to resolve faster than denied or dismissed cases, because contested off-Table causation petitions require multi-round expert witness testimony.
Who decides VICP cases?
Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Office of Special Masters, decide VICP petitions. There are approximately 8 active Special Masters at any given time, including a Chief Special Master who manages the docket. Decisions can be appealed to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (judges) and from there to the Federal Circuit.