Special Master scorecard

Live · 13,358 cases in database · latest filing 2026-05-12

Outcome, award and timing statistics for every special master in the registry, computed directly from the decisions in this database. Use the condition filter to compare like with like: a docket heavy in SIRVA settlements will always show a higher win rate than one heavy in contested encephalopathy claims, so the headline win rate mostly reflects case mix. The contested win rate column counts only reasoned decisions, where a Special Master actually ruled on entitlement.

Special Masters shown
11
with at least 5 cases for SIRVA claims
Petitioner win rate
94%
6,533 decided cases
Median award
$65K
5,812 compensated cases
Median time to decision
20 mo
6,489 dated cases

Special Master scorecard

Special MasterCasesWin rateContested win rate (n)Settled shareMedian awardMedian timeMost common condition
Brian H. Corcoran4,42694%79% (622)84%$60K23 moSIRVA
Nora Beth Dorsey1,36898%92% (84)92%$85K12 moSIRVA
Daniel T. Horner10672%59% (51)59%$60K43 moSIRVA
Denise K. Vowell94100%n=195%$100K6 moSIRVA
Christian J. Moran9279%56% (18)85%$60K27 moSIRVA
Thomas L. Gowen9186%79% (24)74%$66K27 moSIRVA
Herbrina Sanders Young5155%30% (20)75%$45K36 moSIRVA
Katherine E. Oler4969%53% (15)76%$45K31 moSIRVA
Mindy Michaels Roth4358%29% (14)84%$49K43 moSIRVA
Laura D. Millman4082%14% (7)97%$110K12 moSIRVA
Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman19100%n=095%$111K11 moSIRVA
Petitioner win rate, 11 highest-volume special masters for SIRVA claims
Share of decided cases (compensated or entitlement granted) among compensated, entitlement, denied and dismissed.
Median award for SIRVA claims
Compensated cases with a recorded award, fee-only awards excluded.
Median months from filing to decision for SIRVA claims
Cases with both a filing date and a decision date.

What a Special Master's numbers do and do not tell you

Special Masters in the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims decide Vaccine Injury Compensation Program petitions without a jury and under a relaxed evidentiary standard. Cases are assigned administratively, and since 2017 most shoulder-injury (SIRVA) petitions have been routed to a dedicated docket, which is why one Chief Special Master appears on roughly half of all decisions in this registry and why raw win rates differ so sharply between judges. A high overall win rate mostly means a docket full of Table claims that the government concedes or settles.

The measure that actually compares judges is the contested win rate: the share of reasoned entitlement decisions in which the petitioner prevailed. Even that is confounded by which conditions and which theories reach a hearing in front of each Special Master. Read the two columns together, use the condition filter, and open the individual hub page for the decisions themselves before drawing a conclusion about any one adjudicator.

How to read this. Win rate = compensated or entitlement-granted cases divided by all decided cases (compensated, entitlement granted, denied, dismissed). Dismissals include voluntary withdrawals. Settled share = wins resolved by stipulation or proffer rather than a ruling. Median award uses compensated cases with a recorded dollar award and excludes attorney-fee-only awards. Fields were extracted from the public decisions by an AI pipeline and spot-checked; individual values can be wrong, aggregates are robust. Cases before 2014 are sparse in this corpus.