Off-Table causation wins

Live · 13,358 cases in database · latest filing 2026-05-12

The citable precedent set for causation-in-fact. These are the reasoned decisions in which a Special Master found, under Althen v. HHS, that a vaccine more likely than not caused an injury that is not on the Vaccine Injury Table, or fell outside its onset window. Filter by condition and vaccine to find the decisions, Special Masters and experts behind a theory that has already succeeded.

Off-Table wins
168
reasoned decisions finding causation
Shown
14
after filters
Conditions
14
distinct categories
With named expert
55
petitioner expert identified in text
Off-Table causation wins by condition
Reasoned decisions where the petitioner proved causation without a Table presumption.

Decisions

DecidedCaseVaccineConditionSpecial MasterPetitioner's expert(s)BasisAward
2026-03-02Carolann SinclairPneumococcalGuillain-Barré SyndromeThomas L. GowenJohn, Lawrence Steinman, John HixsonAlthen analysis (Table also discussed)entitlement
2025-12-30Donna Faye McKenneyPneumococcalGuillain-Barré SyndromeThomas L. GowenDavid, Axelrod, Kevin JamisonOff-Tableentitlement
2025-09-23Doris DiPonzianoPneumococcalGuillain-Barré SyndromeThomas L. GowenRobert Knobler, Robert HyzyAlthen analysis (Table also discussed)$250K
2025-07-08Noah E. MusickPneumococcalGuillain-Barré SyndromeThomas L. GowenLawrence SteinmanAlthen analysis (Table also discussed)entitlement
2025-01-15R.S.PneumococcalTransverse myelitisHerbrina Sanders Youngnot identifiedOff-Table—
2024-07-29Jeffrey CooperPneumococcalGuillain-Barré SyndromeDaniel T. Hornernot identifiedOff-Table$181K
2024-07-08Dianne ByrdPneumococcalGuillain-Barré SyndromeThomas L. GowenDavid AxelrodAlthen analysis (Table also discussed)entitlement
2024-04-26Donald D. MeyerPneumococcalGuillain-Barré SyndromeNora Beth Dorseynot identifiedOff-Table$454K
2022-10-26Nancy RisslerPneumococcalSIRVAHerbrina Sanders Youngnot identifiedOff-Table$40K
2022-09-22Jennifer GrossPneumococcalGuillain-Barré SyndromeNora Beth Dorseynot identifiedOff-Tableentitlement
2022-05-03Carolyn PiersonPneumococcalGuillain-Barré SyndromeDaniel T. Hornernot identifiedOff-Table$155K
2018-09-13Shelly A. ChmielewskiPneumococcalSIRVANora Beth Dorseynot identifiedOff-Table$135K
2016-04-26M.R.PneumococcalSeizure disorderNora Beth Dorseynot identifiedOff-Table$215K
2011-07-05Hayley GravesPneumococcalSeizure disorderChristian J. MoranMarcel KinsbourneAlthen analysis—
Selection rule. A case is listed when a Special Master issued a reasoned decision in the petitioner's favour and either the extracted theory of causation is Off-Table, or the decision text applies the Althen test. Where the text also discusses a Table injury the Basis column says so; some of those are alternative holdings or Table claims with an Althen fallback, so check the decision. SIRVA rulings are included only when explicitly Off-Table (pre-2017 shoulder claims). Expert names are read from the decision text where the opinion attributes them to the petitioner; absence means the text did not name one in a recognisable form, not that none testified. Verify against the linked decision before citing.

How off-Table causation is decided

When an injury is not on the Vaccine Injury Table, or falls outside its onset window, the petitioner must prove causation under the three-part test from Althen v. Secretary of HHS (Fed. Cir. 2005): a medical theory connecting the vaccine to the injury, a logical sequence of cause and effect in this petitioner's case, and a medically appropriate interval between vaccination and onset. The standard is preponderance of the evidence, and the Special Master weighs competing expert reports rather than requiring epidemiological proof.

That makes prior reasoned decisions the working precedent of the program. A theory accepted for a given vaccine and condition is easier to carry the second time, and the experts who carried it are the ones later petitioners retain. Decisions are not formally binding on other Special Masters, but they are cited constantly, and the Court of Federal Claims and the Federal Circuit review them for arbitrariness rather than re-trying the facts.