Cherish Moore v. HHS - Tdap, Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) (2023)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Cherish Moore filed a petition on November 13, 2020, alleging that a Tdap vaccination she received on October 2, 2019, caused her to develop a right Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA). The Special Master previously issued a Finding of Fact on December 8, 2022, determining that Ms.
Moore experienced pain and shoulder dysfunction within the required timeframe after her vaccination. Respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed an amended Rule 4(c) report on January 30, 2023, conceding that Ms.
Moore suffered SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Respondent acknowledged that Ms.
Moore had no prior history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her right shoulder that would explain her symptoms, that her pain began within 48 hours of the vaccination, that the pain was limited to the right shoulder where the vaccine was administered, and that no other condition or abnormality explained her symptoms. Respondent also acknowledged that Ms.
Moore suffered residual effects of her condition for more than six months. Based on the evidence and respondent's concession, Special Master Thomas L.
Gowen found that Ms. Moore established a Table SIRVA injury and is entitled to compensation.
A separate order will address damages. Petitioner was represented by Jessica A.
Olins of Maglio Christopher & Toale Law Firm, and respondent was represented by Madelyn E. Weeks of the U.S.
Department of Justice. The decision was issued on March 3, 2023.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Cherish Moore received a Tdap vaccination on October 2, 2019. She alleged and was found to have suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA), which is a Table injury. Respondent conceded that Ms. Moore met all criteria for SIRVA: no prior shoulder issues, onset of pain within 48 hours of vaccination, pain limited to the vaccinated shoulder, no other condition explaining the symptoms, and residual effects for over six months. The Special Master, Thomas L. Gowen, found entitlement based on the record and respondent's concession. A separate damages order was to be issued. Petitioner was represented by Jessica A. Olins, and respondent by Madelyn E. Weeks. The ruling on entitlement was issued on March 3, 2023.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01589