Misty Hernandez v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2022)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Misty Hernandez filed a petition on January 31, 2019, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. She alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccination received on September 15, 2016.
The respondent denied that Ms. Hernandez sustained a SIRVA Table injury, denied that the flu vaccine caused her alleged SIRVA or any other injury, and denied that her current condition was a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.
Despite these denials, both parties agreed to settle the case. Special Master Katherine E.
Oler reviewed the file and adopted the parties' stipulation as the court's decision. The stipulation awarded Misty Hernandez a lump sum of $42,500.00, payable to her, and a lump sum of $948.07 to reimburse a Medicaid lien for services rendered by the State of Texas, Cigna Medicare STAR+PLUS.
This latter amount was to be paid jointly to Ms. Hernandez and The Rawlings Company, with Ms.
Hernandez agreeing to endorse the check. The total award represents compensation for all damages available under the Act.
The decision was entered on September 27, 2022. Petitioner was represented by Jeffrey Pop of Jeffrey S.
Pop & Associates, and Respondent was represented by Nancy Tinch of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Misty Hernandez alleged a Table shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccination on September 15, 2016. Respondent denied the alleged SIRVA and causation. The parties reached a stipulation to settle the case. The stipulation awarded Petitioner $42,500.00 as a lump sum and $948.07 for a Medicaid lien reimbursement. Special Master Katherine E. Oler adopted the stipulation as the decision. The public text does not detail the specific medical mechanism, expert testimony, or the reasoning behind the stipulation beyond the parties' agreement to settle. The attorneys involved were Jeffrey Pop for Petitioner and Nancy Tinch for Respondent. The decision date was September 27, 2022.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00180