Nicholas D. Goettl v. HHS - Influenza, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) or Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) (2024)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Nicholas D. Goettl filed a petition on August 2, 2021, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
He alleged that he received an influenza vaccine on October 17, 2018, and subsequently developed Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) or Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP). Mr.
Goettl claimed his condition was either a "Table injury" or, in the alternative, was caused-in-fact or significantly aggravated by the flu vaccine, with residual effects lasting over six months. The respondent denied that the flu vaccine caused Mr.
Goettl's alleged injuries or any aggravation of a pre-existing condition. Despite these opposing positions, both parties agreed to settle the case through a stipulation filed on April 4, 2024.
Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran reviewed the stipulation and found it reasonable, adopting it as the decision in the case.
The stipulation awarded Mr. Goettl a lump sum of $62,500.00, payable by check, as compensation for all damages.
This award resolves the case, and judgment is to be entered unless a motion for review is filed. Petitioner was represented by Anne C.
Toale, and Respondent was represented by Felicia Langel.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Nicholas D. Goettl received an influenza vaccine on October 17, 2018. He alleged he subsequently developed Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) or Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), claiming it was a Table injury or caused-in-fact/significantly aggravated by the vaccine, with residual effects lasting over six months. Respondent denied causation. The parties settled via stipulation filed April 4, 2024. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation, awarding Petitioner $62,500.00 as compensation for all damages. Petitioner counsel was Anne C. Toale; Respondent counsel was Felicia Langel. The public decision does not describe the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or detailed clinical findings.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01644