Patricia Gould v. HHS - Tdap, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2023)

Filed 2021-01-12Decided 2023-06-14Vaccine Tdap
compensated$33,000

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Patricia Gould filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on January 12, 2021. She alleged that she received a tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine on April 4, 2019, and subsequently suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) that lasted for more than six months.

The respondent denied that the petitioner sustained a Table injury for SIRVA, denied that the vaccine caused her alleged shoulder injury or any other injury, and denied that her current condition was a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. Despite these denials, on May 12, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing that compensation should be awarded.

Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran reviewed the stipulation, found it reasonable, and adopted it as the decision.

Ms. Gould was awarded a lump sum of $33,000.00, payable to her, as compensation for all items of damages.

The decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical examinations, diagnostic tests, or treatments. Petitioner was represented by Leigh Finfer of Muller Brazil, LLP, and respondent was represented by Meghan Murphy of the U.S.

Department of Justice.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Patricia Gould alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following a Tdap vaccination on April 4, 2019, with injury lasting over six months. Respondent denied a Table injury, causation, or sequela. The parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation, which Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran found reasonable and adopted. The decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or the basis for the stipulation, other than noting it was a "Table" injury. The award was a lump sum of $33,000.00. Petitioner counsel was Leigh Finfer; respondent counsel was Meghan Murphy. Decision date was June 14, 2023.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded