Louie Garcia v. HHS - Hepatitis B, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) (2022)

Filed 2018-03-23Decided 2022-05-19Vaccine Hepatitis B
compensated$68,690

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Louie Garcia filed a petition for compensation on March 23, 2018, alleging that the Hepatitis B vaccine he received on June 13, 2017, caused him to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The Hepatitis B vaccine is listed on the Vaccine Injury Table.

Mr. Garcia alleged that he suffered residual effects from this injury for more than six months.

Respondent denied that the vaccine caused his alleged injuries or current disabilities. The parties, represented by Leah V.

Durant for the petitioner and Parisa Tabassian for the respondent, reached a joint stipulation for compensation. Special Master Christian J.

Moran adopted the stipulation as the decision of the Court. The award included a lump sum payment of $67,500.00 payable to the petitioner.

Additionally, $1,190.92 was awarded to reimburse a Medicaid lien for services rendered by the State of California, payable jointly to the petitioner and the California Health and Human Services Agency. This award covers all damages available under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

The decision was filed on May 19, 2022. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical tests, treatments, or expert witnesses.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Louie Garcia alleged that the Hepatitis B vaccine administered on June 13, 2017, caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA), an condition listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. Petitioner further alleged residual effects lasting more than six months. Respondent denied causation. The parties reached a joint stipulation for compensation, which was adopted by Special Master Christian J. Moran. The stipulation resulted in an award of $67,500.00 for general damages and $1,190.92 for reimbursement of a Medicaid lien. The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or the evidence considered in reaching the stipulation. The decision date was May 19, 2022. Petitioner was represented by Leah V. Durant and Respondent by Parisa Tabassian.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded