John G. Rima v. HHS - Influenza, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) (2019)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
John G. Rima filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on October 16, 2017.
He alleged that he suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) after receiving an influenza vaccine on October 29, 2014. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit.
On August 31, 2018, a ruling on entitlement found Mr. Rima entitled to compensation for GBS.
On March 19, 2019, the respondent filed a proffer on the award of compensation, stating that Mr. Rima should be awarded $101,297.89.
This amount consisted of $100,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,297.89 for unreimbursed medical expenses. The proffer indicated that Mr.
Rima agreed with this award. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey adopted the proffer and awarded Mr.
Rima a lump sum payment of $101,297.89, payable by check to John G. Rima.
This award represents compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Mr.
Rima is a competent adult. Petitioner was represented by Kelly Danielle Burdette of Burdette Law, PLLC, and respondent was represented by Adriana Ruth Teitel of the U.S.
Department of Justice. The decision was issued on May 29, 2019.
Theory of causation
Petitioner John G. Rima alleged Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) following an influenza vaccine administered on October 29, 2014. A ruling on entitlement issued on August 31, 2018, found petitioner entitled to compensation for GBS. Respondent filed a proffer on March 19, 2019, agreeing to an award of $101,297.89, comprising $100,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,297.89 for unreimbursed medical expenses. Petitioner agreed with the proffered award. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey adopted the proffer and awarded the lump sum payment on May 29, 2019. The specific theory of causation, medical experts, or mechanism of injury were not detailed in the public decision text. Petitioner was represented by Kelly Danielle Burdette, and respondent by Adriana Ruth Teitel.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-01534