Answers built from this attorney's public case docket.
How do I find a good VICP lawyer?
Most petitioners hire counsel because the program's evidentiary burden, expert-witness requirements, and procedural rules are complex. Reasonable attorney fees in VICP cases are paid by the program — not by the petitioner — under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(1), so engaging counsel does not reduce a successful petitioner's recovery. Browse this index to research individual attorneys' case histories.
Who is James E. Baker?
James E. Baker is a petitioner attorney with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Office of Special Masters, who represents petitioners in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). The VICP Registry shows 1 petitions filed by James E. Baker between 2004 and 2004.
How many VICP cases has James E. Baker filed?
James E. Baker has filed 1 petitions in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program according to the VICP Registry. Of these, 0 resulted in compensation, for an overall compensation rate of 0%.
What is James E. Baker's VICP compensation rate?
James E. Baker's overall compensation rate across all VICP petitions is 0% (0 compensated cases out of 1 total).
What law firm is James E. Baker associated with?
James E. Baker has been associated with Miracle, Pruzan, Pruzan & Baker, Seattle in cases filed under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.