Edward Diaz v. HHS - Tdap, right shoulder injuries related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2022)

Filed 2020-04-30Decided 2022-07-08Vaccine Tdap
compensated$25,000

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Edward Diaz filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on April 30, 2020, alleging he suffered right shoulder injuries related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) from a Tetanus, Diphtheria, and acellular Pertussis (Tdap) vaccination he received on January 11, 2019. Mr.

Diaz stated the vaccination occurred in the United States, his symptoms lasted over six months, and he had not received prior compensation for this injury. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that Mr.

Diaz sustained a SIRVA Table Injury, denied that the vaccine caused his alleged shoulder injuries or any other injury, and denied that his current condition was a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury. Despite these denials, the parties filed a joint stipulation on July 8, 2022, agreeing to an award of compensation.

Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran reviewed the stipulation, found it reasonable, and adopted it as his decision.

Mr. Diaz was awarded $25,000.00 as a lump sum, payable by check, representing compensation for all items of damages.

This decision represents the final award for his SIRVA claim. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, the clinical course, diagnostic tests, treatments, or expert witnesses.

Petitioner counsel was Maximillian J. Muller of Muller Brazil, LLP.

Respondent counsel was Debra A. Filteau Begley of the U.S.

Department of Justice.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Edward Diaz alleged a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) following a Tetanus, Diphtheria, acellular Pertussis (Tdap) vaccination on January 11, 2019. Respondent denied a SIRVA Table Injury and causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation, which Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran found reasonable and adopted. The stipulation resulted in an award of $25,000.00. The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or the basis for the stipulation beyond the parties' agreement. The theory of causation is based on the "Table" provision of the Vaccine Act, indicating a presumed condition listed in the Vaccine Injury Table.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded