Robert Viner v. HHS - Tdap, rheumatoid arthritis (2022)

Filed 2020-03-27Decided 2022-01-05Vaccine Tdap
dismissed

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Robert Viner filed a petition on March 27, 2020, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. He alleged that he suffered from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after receiving the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (Tdap) vaccine on September 18, 2018.

To be eligible for an award, Mr. Viner was required to demonstrate either that his RA was a "Table Injury" listed in the Vaccine Injury Table or that it was actually caused by the Tdap vaccine.

The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, any diagnostic tests performed, or treatments received. The record did not contain evidence of a "Table Injury." Furthermore, the medical records were deemed insufficient to prove that the Tdap vaccine actually caused Mr.

Viner's alleged RA. Mr.

Viner stated that he was unable to retain an expert to support causation-in-fact, which he believed would make it impossible to prove his entitlement to compensation. Consequently, on December 19, 2021, Mr.

Viner filed a motion to dismiss his own petition, citing insufficient proof and the unreasonableness of further proceedings. Special Master Herbrina Sanders granted the motion to dismiss.

No award was made. Petitioner was represented by Amy A.

Senerth of Muller Brazil, LLP, and Respondent was represented by Meghan Murphy of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Robert Viner alleged that he suffered from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following receipt of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (Tdap) vaccine on September 18, 2018. To establish entitlement, Petitioner needed to prove either a "Table Injury" or actual causation. The public decision states that the record did not uncover evidence of a "Table Injury" and that the medical records were insufficient to prove actual causation. Petitioner explicitly stated he was unable to retain an expert to support causation-in-fact. The Special Master's decision, issued by Special Master Herbrina Sanders on January 5, 2022 (originally filed December 22, 2021), granted Petitioner's motion to dismiss for insufficient proof. Petitioner was represented by Amy A. Senerth, and Respondent was represented by Meghan Murphy. No award was made.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded