Dwight Zahringer v. HHS - MMR, developmental delays, with the possibility of an underlying demyelinating condition; Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) (2017)

Filed 2015-09-22Decided 2017-01-11Vaccine MMR
dismissedcognitive/developmental

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Dwight Zahringer filed a petition on September 22, 2015, on behalf of his minor child, B.Z., alleging that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine administered on September 17, 2012, caused developmental delays and potentially a demyelinating condition, as well as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Mr.

Zahringer initially proceeded pro se but later obtained counsel, Lawrence Michel. The petition stated that B.Z. received the MMR vaccine along with varicella, hepatitis A, influenza, and Prevnar vaccines on September 17, 2012.

The respondent is the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Throughout the proceedings, the petitioner repeatedly sought extensions to file an amended petition and an expert report.

However, no expert report was ever filed. The medical records indicated that the first mention of developmental concerns, specifically encouraging speech, appeared in March 2013, and a formal diagnosis of ASD was not considered until September 2014, over two years after the vaccination.

The Special Master reviewed the medical records and found that they did not establish a causal link between the MMR vaccine and B.Z.'s condition, nor did they indicate any reaction following the vaccination. As the petitioner failed to provide a competent medical expert opinion or establish the required Althen factors for an off-Table claim, the Special Master, Mindy Michaels Roth, dismissed the petition for failure to demonstrate entitlement to compensation.

The clerk was ordered to enter judgment accordingly.

Theory of causation

Petitioner alleged that the MMR vaccine administered on September 17, 2012, caused B.Z.'s developmental delays, potential demyelinating condition, and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The case proceeded as an off-Table claim. Petitioner filed medical records but failed to provide an expert report or a competent medical opinion to support causation. The medical records did not indicate any reaction following the September 17, 2012 vaccination. Developmental concerns, specifically the need to encourage speech, were first noted in March 2013, and an ASD diagnosis was not considered until September 2014, over two years post-vaccination. The Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth found that the petitioner failed to establish the three Althen factors: a medical theory connecting the vaccine and injury, a logical sequence of cause and effect, and a proximate temporal relationship. The petition was dismissed for failure to demonstrate entitlement to compensation.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded