Laura A Jones v. HHS - Tdap, vestibular neuronitis (2016)

Filed 2013-04-23Decided 2016-09-27Vaccine Tdap
compensated$350,000

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Laura A. Jones filed a petition on April 23, 2013, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that a Tetanus-Diptheria-acellular-Pertussis (TDaP) vaccine administered on April 22, 2010, caused her to develop vestibular neuronitis and experience residual effects for more than six months.

The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the TDaP vaccination caused the petitioner's alleged condition or any other injury or disability. The parties subsequently filed a joint stipulation on September 1, 2016, agreeing to settle the case.

Special Master Thomas L. Gowen reviewed the stipulation, found it reasonable, and adopted it as the decision of the Court.

As part of the stipulation, petitioner Laura A. Jones was awarded a lump sum of $350,000.00, payable by check, as compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

The decision was posted on the Court's website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. Petitioner's counsel was Barbara D.

Bonar of B. Dahlenburg Bonar P.S.C., and respondent's counsel was Claudia B.

Gangi of the United States Department of Justice. The public decision does not describe the onset of symptoms, specific clinical details, diagnostic tests, treatments, or the medical experts consulted by either party.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Laura A. Jones alleged that a TDaP vaccination on April 22, 2010, caused vestibular neuronitis and its sequelae, with residual effects lasting more than six months. The respondent denied causation. The parties reached a joint stipulation on September 1, 2016, which Special Master Thomas L. Gowen found reasonable and adopted. The stipulation resulted in a compensated outcome of $350,000.00, representing all damages under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner's counsel was Barbara D. Bonar, and respondent's counsel was Claudia B. Gangi. The public decision does not specify the medical mechanism, expert testimony, or detailed evidence supporting the theory of causation, relying instead on the joint stipulation for resolution.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded