{"package_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_90-vv-01187","decision_granule_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_90-vv-01187-cl6645372","petitioner_identifier":"Bridgham","is_minor":null,"age_at_vaccination":null,"age_unit_raw":null,"vaccine_type":null,"vaccination_date":null,"condition_raw":null,"condition_category":"other","autism_spectrum_adjacent":0,"outcome":"denied","award_amount_usd":null,"decision_date":"1995-03-23","extraction_version":"gemini-v2","extracted_at":"2026-04-30T14:08:50.135552+00:00","number_of_concurrent_vaccines":null,"dose_number":null,"time_to_onset_days":null,"theory_of_causation":"unclear","is_death":0,"date_of_death":null,"petition_filed_date":"1990-09-24","case_summary":"On September 24, 1990, the petitioner filed a motion for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. After two evidentiary hearings, the Special Master ruled that the petitioner was entitled to compensation. The petitioner and respondent then negotiated the award amount. The petitioner claims they agreed to $19,000 for attorneys' fees and $11,000 for pain and suffering, and that this agreement was communicated to the special master on April 8, 1993. Respondent disputes this alleged agreement. On May 3, 1993, the special master issued a decision awarding $19,000 for attorneys' fees but did not mention an award for pain and suffering. The petitioner did not seek review or intervention. Judgment was entered on May 20, 1993, and June 3, 1993. Five months later, on November 10, 1993, the petitioner filed a motion to correct judgment, seeking the $11,000 for pain and suffering. The special master determined she lacked jurisdiction to decide the motion, citing Patton v. Secretary of DHHS. The motion was forwarded to the Court of Federal Claims. The court denied the motion, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a clerical mistake under Rule 60(a) as there was no evidence in the record of an agreement for pain and suffering damages. Relief under Rule 60(b)(1) for mistake or excusable neglect was also denied due to the unreasonable delay of five months after judgment and the lack of a legally sufficient excuse. The court also found no basis for relief under Rule 60(b)(4) for a void judgment.","is_minor_inferred":null,"is_pediatric_broad":0,"special_master":"E. LaVon French","petitioner_identifier_original":null,"caption_petitioner_name":"Bridgham","petitioner_attorney_name":null,"petitioner_attorney_firm":null,"petitioner_attorney_location":null,"adjudicator_name":null,"caption_people_backfilled_at":"2026-05-05 23:46:28","attorney_canonical_keys":null,"firm_canonical_key":null,"package_title":"Bridgham v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services","canonical_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_90-vv-01187","plain_text_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_90-vv-01187.txt","json_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_90-vv-01187.json","source_documents":[{"granule_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_90-vv-01187-cl6645372","title":"Bridgham v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services","docket_text":"lead-opinion","date_issued":"1995-03-23","pdf_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6762632/bridgham-v-secretary-of-the-department-of-health-human-services/","pdf_bytes":null,"triage_decision":"keep","triage_reason":"recovered via CL opinion 6645372 (html_with_citations)","download_status":"ok","registry_pdf_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/pdf/USCOURTS-cofc-1_90-vv-01187/USCOURTS-cofc-1_90-vv-01187-cl6645372"}]}