{"package_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_89-vv-00071","decision_granule_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_89-vv-00071-cl6643760","petitioner_identifier":"Saunders, and","is_minor":null,"age_at_vaccination":null,"age_unit_raw":null,"vaccine_type":null,"vaccination_date":null,"condition_raw":null,"condition_category":"other","autism_spectrum_adjacent":0,"outcome":"compensated","award_amount_usd":null,"decision_date":"1993-06-01","extraction_version":"gemini-v2","extracted_at":"2026-07-01T16:09:33.850609+00:00","number_of_concurrent_vaccines":null,"dose_number":null,"time_to_onset_days":null,"theory_of_causation":"unclear","is_death":0,"date_of_death":null,"petition_filed_date":null,"case_summary":"This case involves a review of a special master's decision regarding attorneys' fees and costs under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Program. The petitioner's claim for compensation on the merits had previously been denied, and this denial was affirmed on appeal. Subsequently, the petitioner elected to file a civil action rather than accept the judgment. The respondent argued that attorneys' fees and costs, as a form of compensation, could only be awarded if the petitioner accepted the judgment. However, the court, reviewing the special master's decision, upheld the award of $30,000 for attorneys' fees and costs. The court found that the special master's interpretation of the statute, allowing for such an award even when the petitioner did not accept the judgment on the merits, was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. The court affirmed the special master's decision, directing judgment to be entered accordingly.","is_minor_inferred":null,"is_pediatric_broad":0,"special_master":null,"petitioner_identifier_original":"Munn","caption_petitioner_name":"Munn","petitioner_attorney_name":null,"petitioner_attorney_firm":null,"petitioner_attorney_location":null,"adjudicator_name":"found that","caption_people_backfilled_at":"2026-07-11 09:33:35","attorney_canonical_keys":null,"firm_canonical_key":null,"date_of_birth":null,"vaccine_type_canonical":null,"condition_category_specifics":null,"fees_and_costs_usd":30000,"attorney_unavailable_reason":"not_in_source","package_title":"Munn v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services","canonical_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_89-vv-00071","plain_text_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_89-vv-00071.txt","json_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_89-vv-00071.json","source_documents":[{"granule_id":"USCOURTS-cofc-1_89-vv-00071-cl6643760","title":"Munn v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services","docket_text":"lead-opinion","date_issued":"1993-06-01","pdf_url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6761052/munn-v-secretary-of-the-department-of-health-human-services/","pdf_bytes":null,"triage_decision":"keep","triage_reason":"recovered via CL opinion 6643760 (html_with_citations)","download_status":"ok","registry_pdf_url":"https://vicp-registry.org/pdf/USCOURTS-cofc-1_89-vv-00071/USCOURTS-cofc-1_89-vv-00071-cl6643760"}]}