VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01815
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01815
Petitioner: Jacob R. Hildebrandt
Filed: 2025-10-27
Decided: 2026-06-15
Vaccine: tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis
Vaccination date: 2023-08-21
Condition: left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: entitlement_granted_pending_damages
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
Jacob R. Hildebrandt filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on October 27, 2025. He alleged that he suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccination on August 21, 2023. He further alleged that he suffered residual effects of this condition for more than six months. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) report on June 12, 2026, conceding that the petitioner is entitled to compensation. Based on the respondent's concession and the evidence of record, the Chief Special Master found that the petitioner is entitled to compensation. The case is proceeding to determine damages.

Theory of causation field:
Table

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01815-0
Date issued/filed: 2026-07-17
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 06/15/2026 ) regarding 19 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (nh) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:25-vv-01815-UNJ Document 28 Filed 07/17/26 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 25-1815V
JACOB R. HILDEBRANDT,
Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner,
v. Filed: June 15, 2026
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Timothy J. Lessman, Knutson & Casey Law Firm, Mankato, MN, for Petitioner.
Adam N. Muffett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On October 27, 2025, Jacob Hildebrandt filed a petition for compensation under
the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis
vaccination on August 21, 2023. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges she suffered the
residual effects of this condition for more than six months. Id. The case was assigned to
the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On June 12, 2026, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or
at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2018).

Case 1:25-vv-01815-UNJ Document 28 Filed 07/17/26 Page 2 of 2
Specifically, Respondent has indicated that based on the current record, Petitioner has
satisfied all requirements for compensation under the Act. Id. at 6.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2