VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01464 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01464 Petitioner: Karen Ward Filed: 2025-09-03 Decided: 2026-04-28 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2024-10-10 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: entitlement_granted_pending_damages Award amount USD: AI-assisted case summary: Karen Ward filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on April 28, 2026. She alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza vaccination on October 10, 2024, and experienced residual effects for more than six months. The respondent conceded that Ms. Ward is entitled to compensation for her SIRVA, indicating that she satisfied all legal prerequisites. Based on the respondent's concession and the evidence of record, the Chief Special Master found that Ms. Ward is entitled to compensation. The case is proceeding to determine damages. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01464-0 Date issued/filed: 2026-06-08 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 04/28/2026) regarding 18 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (cr) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:25-vv-01464-UNJ Document 25 Filed 06/08/26 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-1464V KAREN WARD, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: April 28, 2026 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. John Beaulieu, Siri & Glimstad LLP, Louisville, KY, for Petitioner. Lauren Kells, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On September 3, 2025, Karen Ward filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving an influenza vaccination on October 10, 2024. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Id. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On April 23, 2026, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case for her SIRVA. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) 1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:25-vv-01464-UNJ Document 25 Filed 06/08/26 Page 2 of 2 Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent has indicated that he is satisfied that, based on the record as it now stands, Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id. at 5. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2