VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01133 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01133 Petitioner: Nancy Vazquez Campoverde Filed: 2025-07-07 Decided: 2026-01-30 Vaccine: human papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination date: 2024-05-09 Condition: left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: entitlement_granted_pending_damages Award amount USD: AI-assisted case summary: On July 7, 2025, Nancy Vazquez Campoverde filed a petition alleging a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration after receiving an HPV vaccine on May 9, 2024. Respondent conceded entitlement. The Rule 4(c) report concluded that she had no prior left shoulder pain, inflammation, or dysfunction; that pain began within 48 hours after an intramuscular vaccination; that pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the vaccinated shoulder; and that no other condition explained the shoulder pain. On January 30, 2026, Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran found Ms. Campoverde entitled to compensation. Damages had not yet been resolved in the public ruling. Theory of causation field: HPV vaccine May 9, 2024 causing left SIRVA; adult, exact age not stated; onset within 48 hours. ENTITLEMENT CONCEDED; damages pending. Rule 4(c): no prior left shoulder dysfunction, pain/ROM limited to vaccinated shoulder, no alternative condition. Chief SM Brian H. Corcoran; petition July 7, 2025; decision January 30, 2026. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01133-0 Date issued/filed: 2026-03-09 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 01/30/2026) regarding 18 Ruling on Entitlement ( Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. )(mpj) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:25-vv-01133-UNJ Document 22 Filed 03/09/26 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-1133V NANCY VAZQUEZ CAMPOVERDE, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: January 30, 2026 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for Petitioner. Nathaniel Trager, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On July 7, 2025, Nancy Vazquez Campoverde filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of a human papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccine on May 9, 2024. Petition at ¶¶ 4, 24-35. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on her behalf as a result of her injury. Petition at ¶¶ 28-30. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. (cid:3) 1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:25-vv-01133-UNJ Document 22 Filed 03/09/26 Page 2 of 2 On January 28, 2026, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that, [the Division of Injury Compensation Programs] has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder prior to vaccination; pain occurred within forty-eight hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain petitioner’s shoulder pain. 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a)(XVI)(B), (c)(10). Additionally, based on the medical records outlined above, petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. Therefore, based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 13(a)(1)(B); 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-11(c)(1)(D)(i). Id. at 6. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2(cid:3) (cid:3) ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-01133-cl-extra-11273333 Date issued/filed: 2026-03-09 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10806595 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-1133V NANCY VAZQUEZ CAMPOVERDE, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: January 30, 2026 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for Petitioner. Nathaniel Trager, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On July 7, 2025, Nancy Vazquez Campoverde filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of a human papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccine on May 9, 2024. Petition at ¶¶ 4, 24-35. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on her behalf as a result of her injury. Petition at ¶¶ 28-30. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.  1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). On January 28, 2026, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that, [the Division of Injury Compensation Programs] has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder prior to vaccination; pain occurred within forty-eight hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain petitioner’s shoulder pain. 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a)(XVI)(B), (c)(10). Additionally, based on the medical records outlined above, petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. Therefore, based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 13(a)(1)(B); 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-11(c)(1)(D)(i). Id. at 6. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2