VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00578 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00578 Petitioner: Belinda Lopez Filed: 2025-04-02 Decided: 2025-12-08 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2023-11-09 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: entitlement_granted_pending_damages Award amount USD: AI-assisted case summary: On April 2, 2025, Belinda Lopez filed a petition alleging that an influenza vaccination administered on November 9, 2023 caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration. The public ruling identifies her as an adult but does not state an exact age. Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding entitlement. The public ruling does not describe onset, medical visits, imaging, injections, therapy, or functional limitations. On December 8, 2025, Chief Special Master Corcoran found Ms. Lopez entitled to compensation for Table SIRVA. Damages remain pending. Theory of causation field: Adult petitioner; influenza vaccine November 9, 2023; Table SIRVA. ENTITLEMENT GRANTED, damages pending. Respondent conceded entitlement; public ruling lacks clinical chronology. Petition filed April 2, 2025; entitlement December 8, 2025. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00578-0 Date issued/filed: 2026-01-08 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 12/08/2025) regarding 22 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (nh) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:25-vv-00578-UNJ Document 24 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-0578V BELINDA LOPEZ, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: December 8, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Nathan Joseph Marchese, Siri & Glimstad, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner. Rochelle Ilana Gillenson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On April 2, 2025, Belinda Lopez filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza vaccination she received on November 9, 2023. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that she has suffered the residual effects of her vaccine-related injury for more than six months. Petition at ¶ 20. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On December 5, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Respondent states that “Petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined 1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:25-vv-00578-UNJ Document 24 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2 by the Vaccine Injury Table, Specifically, Petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder prior to vaccination; pain occurred within forty-eight hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain Petitioner’s shoulder pain.” Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that, based on the record as it now stands, Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2