VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00083
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00083
Petitioner: Jing Ding
Filed: 2025-01-17
Decided: 2026-01-05
Vaccine: tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap)
Vaccination date: 2023-08-17
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 47730

AI-assisted case summary:
On January 17, 2025, Jing Ding filed a petition alleging that a Tdap vaccine administered on August 17, 2023 caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration.

Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran found entitlement on August 6, 2025. The public entitlement and damages rulings do not provide a detailed onset narrative, medical visit chronology, imaging, injections, therapy, or residual limitations.

On January 5, 2026, Chief Special Master Corcoran adopted respondent's damages proffer. Ms. Ding was awarded $47,500.00 for pain and suffering and $230.00 in past unreimbursed expenses, for a total lump sum of $47,730.00.

Theory of causation field:
Tdap vaccine August 17, 2023 causing SIRVA; adult, exact age not stated. ENTITLEMENT GRANTED; COMPENSATED. Public rulings lack detailed clinical chronology. Award $47,500 pain/suffering + $230 expenses = $47,730. Chief SM Brian H. Corcoran; petition January 17, 2025; entitlement August 6, 2025; damages January 5, 2026.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00083-0
Date issued/filed: 2025-09-05
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 08/06/2025) regarding 15 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (cr) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:25-vv-00083-UNJ Document 17 Filed 09/05/25 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 25-83V
JING DING, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: August 6, 2025
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On January 17, 2025, Jing Ding (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2
(the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of receiving a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular
pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on August 17, 2023. Pet., ECF No. 1. Petitioner further
alleges that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months. Id.
The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On August 4, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at
1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or
at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2018).

Case 1:25-vv-00083-UNJ Document 17 Filed 09/05/25 Page 2 of 2
1, ECF No. 13. Specifically, Respondent indicated that “[P]etitioner’s alleged injury is
consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 5. Respondent does
not dispute that Petitioner “has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under
the Act.” Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00083-1
Date issued/filed: 2026-02-10
Pages: 4
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 01/05/2026) regarding 22 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (cr) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:25-vv-00083-UNJ Document 26 Filed 02/10/26 Page 1 of 4
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 25-83V
JING DING, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: January 5, 2026
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On January 17, 2025, Petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis
(“Tdap”) vaccination administered to her on August 17, 2023. Pet., ECF No. 1. Petitioner
further alleges that the vaccine was received in the United States, she suffered sequela
of her injury for more than six months, and neither Petitioner nor any other party has ever
received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for her vaccine-related
injury. Id. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special
Masters.
On August 6, 2025, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled
to compensation for her SIRVA. ECF No. 15. On January 5, 2026, Respondent filed a
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or
at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In
accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other
information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I
agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2018).

Case 1:25-vv-00083-UNJ Document 26 Filed 02/10/26 Page 2 of 4
Proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded
$47,500.00 in pain and suffering and $230.00 in past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer
at 1, ECF No. 21. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the
proffered award. See id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled
to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
sum payment of $47,730.00 for pain and suffering and past unreimbursable
expenses to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA
account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents
compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:25-vv-00083-UNJ Document 26 Filed 02/10/26 Page 3 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
JING DING,
Petitioner,
No. 25-83
v. Chief Special Master Corcoran
SPU
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Procedural History and Items of Compensation
On August 4, 2025, respondent filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, and conceded that
entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. ECF No. 13.
Thereafter, on August 6, 2025, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding
that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her left Shoulder Injury Related to
Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). ECF Nos. 15-16.
Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
$47,730.00, which is comprised of damages for pain and suffering ($47,500.00) and
unreimbursed expenses ($230.00). This amount represents all elements of compensation to
which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees.
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
and future pain and suffering.

Case 1:25-vv-00083-UNJ Document 26 Filed 02/10/26 Page 4 of 4
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
a lump sum payment of $47,730.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s
IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respectfully submitted,
BRETT A. SHUMATE
Assistant Attorney General
JONATHAN D. GUYNN
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
JULIA M. COLLISON
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/ Mallori B. Openchowski
MALLORI B. OPENCHOWSKI
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044-0146
Tel.: (202) 305-0660
mallori.b.openchowski@usdoj.gov
DATED: January 5, 2026