VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00067
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00067
Petitioner: K.M.
Filed: 2025-09-15
Decided: 2025-10-14
Vaccine: human papillomavirus
Vaccination date: 2022-07-13
Condition: 
Outcome: dismissed
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
Janyce Majerus filed a petition on behalf of her minor child, K.M., alleging injury following a human papillomavirus vaccination received on July 13, 2022, and July 14, 2023. The petition was filed on September 15, 2025. Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified by Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice was issued. On September 12, 2025, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw the petition. The Chief Special Master granted the request to withdraw, concluding the proceedings. No judgment on the merits was entered.

Theory of causation field:
unclear

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00067-0
Date issued/filed: 2025-10-14
Pages: 1
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 9/15/2025) regarding 14 Order Concluding Proceedings. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (abs) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:25-vv-00067-UNJ Document 15 Filed 10/14/25 Page 1 of 1
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 25-67V
UNPUBLISHED
JANYCE MAJERUS, on behalf of
her minor child, K.M.,
Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner,
v.
Filed: September 15, 2025
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
On January 15, 2025, Janyce Majerus filed a petition for compensation on behalf
of her minor child, K.M., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42
U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.2 Petitioner alleged that K.M. suffered injuries after
receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on July 13, 2022, and July 14, 2023. ECF
No. 1.
Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine
Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition
under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section
300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42
U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On September 12, 2025, Petitioner timely filed a notice to
withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b).
In light of Petitioner’s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner’s request to withdraw the
petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that
proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment
“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
1 Because this Order contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or
at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet.
In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or
other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon
review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public
access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.