VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00061
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00061
Petitioner: Santos Diaz
Filed: 2025-01-14
Decided: 2025-10-21
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2022-10-25
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 110000

AI-assisted case summary:
On January 14, 2025, Santos Diaz filed a petition alleging that an influenza vaccination administered on October 25, 2022 caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration. He alleged that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that the residual effects lasted more than six months, and that no civil action or other compensation had been received for the injury.

Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding that Mr. Diaz's alleged injury was consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table and that all legal prerequisites were met. The public entitlement and damages decisions do not describe his first symptom, onset narrative, medical testing, treatment, injections, therapy, or functional losses.

Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran found Mr. Diaz entitled to compensation on August 26, 2025. On October 21, 2025, he awarded $110,000.00 for pain and suffering, payable as a lump sum through counsel's IOLTA account. Mr. Diaz was represented by Maximillian J. Muller of Muller Brazil, LLP.

Theory of causation field:
Adult petitioner; influenza vaccine October 25, 2022; Table SIRVA. COMPENSATED. Respondent conceded Table SIRVA and legal prerequisites; public text lacks clinical chronology. Entitlement August 26, 2025; damages October 21, 2025. Award $110,000.00 pain/suffering. Petition filed January 14, 2025. Attorney: Maximillian J. Muller.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00061-0
Date issued/filed: 2025-09-30
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 08/26/2025) regarding 16 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (cr) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:25-vv-00061-UNJ Document 20 Filed 09/30/25 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 25-0061V
SANTOS DIAZ, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: August 26, 2025
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Emilie Williams, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On January 14, 2025, Santos Diaz filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving an influenza (“flu”)
vaccine on October 25, 2022. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 29. Petitioner also alleged that he
received the vaccine within the United States, that he suffered the residual effects of his
SIRVA for more than six months and that neither he nor any other party has filed a civil
action or received compensation for his SIRVA, alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 1,
1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or
at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2018).

Case 1:25-vv-00061-UNJ Document 20 Filed 09/30/25 Page 2 of 2
25-27. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special
Masters.
On August 25, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at
1. Specifically, Respondent “has concluded that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent
with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 10. Respondent further agrees
that based on the record as it now stands, [P]etitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites
for compensation under the Act.” Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_25-vv-00061-1
Date issued/filed: 2025-12-15
Pages: 5
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/21/2025) regarding 23 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (cr) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:25-vv-00061-UNJ Document 28 Filed 12/15/25 Page 1 of 5
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 25-0061V
SANTOS DIAZ, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: October 21, 2025
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Emilie Williams, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On January 14, 2025, Santos Diaz filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving an influenza (“flu”)
vaccine on October 25, 2022. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 29. The case was assigned to the Special
Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On August 26, 2025, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding Petitioner entitled to
compensation for his SIRVA. On October 21, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer on award
of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $110,000.00 for pain
and suffering. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or
at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In
accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other
information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I
agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2018).

Case 1:25-vv-00061-UNJ Document 28 Filed 12/15/25 Page 2 of 5
with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is
entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
sum payment of $110,000.00 for pain and suffering, to be paid through an ACH
deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to
Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available
under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:25-vv-00061-UNJ Document 28 Filed 12/15/25 Page 3 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
SANTOS DIAZ,
Petitioner,
v. No. 25-61V (ECF)
Chief Special Master Corcoran
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION1
On January 14, 2025, Santos Diaz (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under
the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”
or “Act”), as amended, alleging that he suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza (“flu”) vaccination he received on October 25,
2022. Petition at 1 (ECF No. 1). On August 25, 2025, the Secretary of Health and Human
Services (“respondent”) filed his Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for
compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 15. On August 26,
2025, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner is entitled
to vaccine compensation. ECF No. 16.
I. Items of Compensation
Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
$110,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
1 This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after
the Damages Decision is issued.

Case 1:25-vv-00061-UNJ Document 28 Filed 12/15/25 Page 4 of 5
This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award/Recommended Payment
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through one lump sum payment as described below and request that the Chief Special Master’s
decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:2
A lump sum payment of $110,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s
counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner, Santos Diaz.
Petitioner is a competent adult. Proof of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respectfully submitted,
BRETT A. SHUMATE
Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
VORIS E. JOHNSON, JR.
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
2

Case 1:25-vv-00061-UNJ Document 28 Filed 12/15/25 Page 5 of 5
s/Emilie F. Williams
EMILIE F. WILLIAMS
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
T: (202) 305-0124
Dated: October 21, 2025 E: emilie.williams@usdoj.gov
3