VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01698 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01698 Petitioner: Ashley Loncarich-Boeckman Filed: 2024-10-18 Decided: 2025-12-16 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2022-10-19 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 52500 AI-assisted case summary: On October 18, 2024, Ashley Loncarich-Boeckman, then 37, filed a petition alleging that an influenza vaccine administered on October 19, 2022 caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration. Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) report and proffer, conceding that Ms. Loncarich-Boeckman's claim satisfied the requirements for a Table SIRVA. The public ruling does not describe her onset story, medical visits, imaging, therapy, injections, or functional limitations. On December 16, 2025, Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran found entitlement and awarded $52,500.00 for pain and suffering as a lump sum through counsel's IOLTA account. Theory of causation field: Influenza vaccine October 19, 2022 at age 37 causing Table SIRVA. ENTITLEMENT CONCEDED; COMPENSATED. Public ruling lacks clinical chronology. Award $52,500 pain/suffering. Chief SM Brian H. Corcoran; petition October 18, 2024; decision December 16, 2025. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01698-0 Date issued/filed: 2026-01-20 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 12/16/2025) regarding 24 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (cr) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:24-vv-01698-UNJ Document 26 Filed 01/20/26 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1698V ASHLEY LONCARICH-BOECKMAN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: December 16, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Timothy Patrick Clancy, Clancy & Thompson, PLLC, Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner. Rachelle Bishop, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On October 18, 2024, Ashley Loncarich-Boeckman filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that the misadministration of an October 19, 2022 influenza vaccine caused her to suffer adverse effects that entitle her to compensation under the Act. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On December 15, 2025, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer, in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that Petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Id. at 4-5 (citing 42 1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:24-vv-01698-UNJ Document 26 Filed 01/20/26 Page 2 of 2 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a), (c)(10)). Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id. at 6 (citing Section 13(a)(1)(B) and Section 11(c)(1)(D)(i)). In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01698-1 Date issued/filed: 2026-01-20 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 12/16/2025) regarding 25 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (cr) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:24-vv-01698-UNJ Document 27 Filed 01/20/26 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1698V ASHLEY LONCARICH-BOECKMAN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: December 16, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Timothy Patrick Clancy, Clancy & Thompson, PLLC, Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner. Rachelle Bishop, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON DAMAGES1 On October 18, 2024, Ashley Loncarich-Boeckman filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that the misadministration of an October 19, 2022 influenza vaccine caused her to suffer adverse effects that entitle her to compensation under the Act. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On December 15, 2025, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer, in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 1, 4-5. On December 16, 2025, I issued a Ruling on Entitlement. 1Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §300aa (2018). Case 1:24-vv-01698-UNJ Document 27 Filed 01/20/26 Page 2 of 2 Respondent represents that Petitioner agrees to his proffer on an award of compensation. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 5. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer,3 Petitioner is awarded a lump sum of $52,500.00 (for pain and suffering) to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount representscompensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Proffer at 6-7. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3Because the combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer contains information regarding Petitioner’s personal medical history, which is not generally included in a Proffer when separately filed, it is not attached hereto. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01698-cl-extra-11243541 Date issued/filed: 2026-01-20 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10776953 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1698V ASHLEY LONCARICH-BOECKMAN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: December 16, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Timothy Patrick Clancy, Clancy & Thompson, PLLC, Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner. Rachelle Bishop, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON DAMAGES1 On October 18, 2024, Ashley Loncarich-Boeckman filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that the misadministration of an October 19, 2022 influenza vaccine caused her to suffer adverse effects that entitle her to compensation under the Act. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On December 15, 2025, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer, in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 1, 4-5. On December 16, 2025, I issued a Ruling on Entitlement. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Respondent represents that Petitioner agrees to his proffer on an award of compensation. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 5. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer,3 Petitioner is awarded a lump sum of $52,500.00 (for pain and suffering) to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Proffer at 6-7. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Because the combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer contains information regarding Petitioner’s personal medical history, which is not generally included in a Proffer when separately filed, it is not attached hereto. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2