VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01255
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01255
Petitioner: Brittany Tant
Filed: 2024-08-15
Decided: 2026-01-16
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 
Condition: cerebellar ataxia
Outcome: dismissed
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
Brittany Tant filed a claim on August 15, 2024, alleging that she developed cerebellar ataxia as a result of receiving the influenza vaccine. The respondent is the Secretary of Health and Human Services. On December 15, 2025, both parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), this stipulation resulted in an Order Concluding Proceedings, meaning the case was dismissed without a judgment. The Clerk of the Court was directed to remove the case from the docket. No award amount was granted as the case was dismissed.

Theory of causation field:
unclear

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01255-0
Date issued/filed: 2026-01-16
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 12/16/2025) regarding 26 Order Concluding Proceedings. Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen. (hs) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:24-vv-01255-UNJ Document 27 Filed 01/16/26 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
Filed: December 16, 2025
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
BRITTANY TANT *
*
Petitioner, * No. 24-1255V
*
v. * Special Master Gowen
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Order Concluding Proceedings
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.
Crystal Fialkowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
On August 15, 2024, Brittany Tant (“petitioner”) filed a claim in the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program.2 Petition (ECF No. 1). Petitioner alleged that as a result of
receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, she developed cerebellar ataxia. Id. at Preamble.
On December 15, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal stating, “The
parties hereby stipulate pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a) that this action shall be dismissed. Joint
Stipulation ¶ 2 (ECF No. 25).
Under Vaccine Rule 21(a), petitioner may engage in a voluntary dismissal by filing a
stipulation of dismissal which all parties have signed, which the parties in this matter have done.
Unver Vaccine Rule 21(a)(3), the result of a joint stipulation of dismissal is an Order Concluding
1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a
reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the website of the United States Court of
Federal Claims. The Court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the opinion
is posted on the Court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information
furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or
confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). An objecting party must provide the Court with a proposed
redacted version of the opinion. Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will
be posted on the Court’s website without any changes. Id.
2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (2012)
(hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereinafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of
the Act.

Case 1:24-vv-01255-UNJ Document 27 Filed 01/16/26 Page 2 of 2
Proceedings. No judgment will enter pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11 for the purposes of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa-21(a).
Thus, this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove this
case from the docket of the undersigned.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas L. Gowen
Thomas L. Gowen
Special Master