VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01169 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01169 Petitioner: James McMahon Filed: 2024-07-31 Decided: 2025-05-08 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2023-11-06 Condition: left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 100100 AI-assisted case summary: On July 31, 2024, James McMahon filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. He alleged that an influenza vaccination administered on November 6, 2023 caused a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration, a Table SIRVA, and that the residual effects lasted for more than six months. Respondent conceded entitlement in a Rule 4(c) report filed February 3, 2025, stating that Mr. McMahon's injury was consistent with the Vaccine Injury Table's SIRVA definition and that the legal prerequisites for compensation were met. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran granted entitlement on February 4, 2025. The public entitlement and damages documents do not describe Mr. McMahon's first symptom, medical visits, imaging, injections, therapy, work limitations, or later clinical course. The damages record instead proceeded by proffer. Respondent noted that additional records filed after the Rule 4(c) report included left-shoulder medical records and then proffered $100,100.00. On May 8, 2025, the Chief Special Master awarded that amount as a lump sum through counsel, consisting of $100,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering, reduced to net present value where required, and $100.00 for past unreimbursed expenses. Later attorney-fee proceedings were separate from the injury award. Theory of causation field: Adult petitioner; influenza vaccine November 6, 2023; left Table SIRVA. COMPENSATED. Respondent conceded that the injury met the SIRVA Table criteria and legal prerequisites; public text does not provide onset specifics beyond Table SIRVA or describe treatment chronology. Chief SM Corcoran granted entitlement February 4, 2025 and awarded damages May 8, 2025. Award $100,100.00 = $100,000.00 actual/projected pain and suffering + $100.00 past unreimbursed expenses. Petition filed July 31, 2024. Counsel: Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01169-0 Date issued/filed: 2025-03-07 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 02/04/2025) regarding 16 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (ppa) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:24-vv-01169-UNJ Document 21 Filed 03/07/25 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1169V JAMES MCMAHON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: February 4, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner. Ilana Sherry Greenberg, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On July 31, 2024, James McMahon filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 6, 2023 Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 14. Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccine within the United States, that he suffered the residual effects of his SIRVA injury for more than six months, and that neither he nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for his SIRVA. Id. at ¶¶ 1, 10-12. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:24-vv-01169-UNJ Document 21 Filed 03/07/25 Page 2 of 2 On February 3, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent “has concluded that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that based on the record as it now stands, [P]etitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 4-5. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01169-cl-extra-10818884 Date issued/filed: 2025-03-07 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10352296 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1169V JAMES MCMAHON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: February 4, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner. Ilana Sherry Greenberg, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On July 31, 2024, James McMahon filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 6, 2023 Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 14. Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccine within the United States, that he suffered the residual effects of his SIRVA injury for more than six months, and that neither he nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for his SIRVA. Id. at ¶¶ 1, 10-12. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). On February 3, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent “has concluded that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that based on the record as it now stands, [P]etitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 4-5. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01169-1 Date issued/filed: 2025-06-09 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 05/08/2025) regarding 27 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (ppa) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:24-vv-01169-UNJ Document 31 Filed 06/09/25 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1169V JAMES MCMAHON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 8, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner. Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On July 31, 2024, James McMahon filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 6, 2023 Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 14. On February 4, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On May 7, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $100,100.00, representing $100,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering3 and $100.00 for past unreimbursed expenses. Proffer at 1, 1 n.2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). 3 Respondent states that amount awarded for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to its net present value as required by Section 15(f)(4)(A). Proffer at 1 n.2. Case 1:24-vv-01169-UNJ Document 31 Filed 06/09/25 Page 2 of 4 that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. at 2. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $100,100.00, representing $100,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering and $100.00 for actual unreimbursable expenses, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:24-vv-01169-UNJ Document 31 Filed 06/09/25 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS JAMES MCMAHON, Petitioner, v. No. 24-1169V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On July 31, 2024, James McMahon (petitioner) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34, alleging that he received an influenza vaccination on November 6, 2023, and thereafter suffered from a left- side shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). See Petition. On February 3, 2025, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (respondent) filed his Rule 4(c) Report recommending that compensation be awarded.1 ECF No. 15. On February 4, 2025, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 16. Respondent now proffers the following compensation: A lump sum payment of $100,100.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).2 1 Respondent notes that since the filing of his Rule 4(c) Report, petitioner filed additional medical records as Exhibits 6-8. Those records include in part that petitioner had left-shoulder arthroscopic surgery on October 10, 2024. Exhibit 7 at 32. 2 This amount represents an award of $100,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering at net present value, and $100.00 for past unreimbursed expenses. This proffer does not include Case 1:24-vv-01169-UNJ Document 31 Filed 06/09/25 Page 4 of 4 Petitioner agrees with the foregoing proffered award.3 Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, YAAKOV M. ROTH Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ RYAN D. PYLES RYAN D. PYLES Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-9847 ryan.pyles@usdoj.gov DATED: May 7, 2025 any award for attorneys’ fees and costs that may be awarded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(e). 3 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings, future expenses, and future pain and suffering. 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 4: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01169-cl-extra-11067811 Date issued/filed: 2025-06-09 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10601223 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1169V JAMES MCMAHON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 8, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner. Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On July 31, 2024, James McMahon filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 6, 2023 Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 14. On February 4, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On May 7, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $100,100.00, representing $100,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering3 and $100.00 for past unreimbursed expenses. Proffer at 1, 1 n.2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). 3 Respondent states that amount awarded for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to its net present value as required by Section 15(f)(4)(A). Proffer at 1 n.2. that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. at 2. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $100,100.00, representing $100,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering and $100.00 for actual unreimbursable expenses, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS JAMES MCMAHON, Petitioner, v. No. 24-1169V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On July 31, 2024, James McMahon (petitioner) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34, alleging that he received an influenza vaccination on November 6, 2023, and thereafter suffered from a left- side shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). See Petition. On February 3, 2025, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (respondent) filed his Rule 4(c) Report recommending that compensation be awarded.1 ECF No. 15. On February 4, 2025, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 16. Respondent now proffers the following compensation: A lump sum payment of $100,100.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).2 1 Respondent notes that since the filing of his Rule 4(c) Report, petitioner filed additional medical records as Exhibits 6-8. Those records include in part that petitioner had left-shoulder arthroscopic surgery on October 10, 2024. Exhibit 7 at 32. 2 This amount represents an award of $100,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering at net present value, and $100.00 for past unreimbursed expenses. This proffer does not include Petitioner agrees with the foregoing proffered award.3 Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, YAAKOV M. ROTH Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ RYAN D. PYLES RYAN D. PYLES Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-9847 ryan.pyles@usdoj.gov DATED: May 7, 2025 any award for attorneys’ fees and costs that may be awarded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(e). 3 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings, future expenses, and future pain and suffering. 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 5: USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-01169-cl-extra-11136705 Date issued/filed: 2025-09-11 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10670118 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1169V JAMES MCMAHON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 12, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner. Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On July 31, 2024, James McMahon filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration following an influenza vaccine he received on November 6, 2023. Petition, ECF No. 1. On February 4, 2025, I issued a ruling on entitlement find the Petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 16. On May 8, 2025, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. ECF No. 27. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $19,123.08 (representing $17,698.70 in fees plus $1,424.38 in costs). Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed June 24, 2025, ECF No. 32. Furthermore, counsel for Petitioner represents that no personal out-of-pocket expenses were incurred by the Petitioner. Motion, at 2. Respondent reacted to the motion on June 27, 2025, indicating that he is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Response at 2, 4. ECF No. 33. Petitioner filed no reply thereafter. I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. The rates requested for work performed through 2025 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations and will therefore be awarded herein. And all time billed to the matter was also reasonably incurred. Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs. Motion, Exhibit B at 16-24. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or amounts sought. I find the requested costs reasonable and hereby award them in full. The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total amount of $19,123.08 (representing $17,698.70 in fees plus $1,424.38 in costs) to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review. 2