Tina Sylva v. HHS - Tdap, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2025)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Petitioner Tina Sylva filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on June 25, 2025. She alleged that she received a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine on March 11, 2021, and subsequently sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table.
Petitioner further alleged that the Tdap vaccine caused her shoulder injury and that she suffered residual effects for more than six months. The respondent denied that Petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury, denied that the vaccine caused her alleged injury or any other injury, and denied that her current condition was a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.
On June 25, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation. Chief Special Master Brian H.
Corcoran found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision. Petitioner was awarded a lump sum of $12,000.00 for all items of damages available under Section 15(a) of the Vaccine Act.
This award was to be paid via ACH deposit to Petitioner's counsel's IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, clinical details of the injury, diagnostic tests, treatments, or expert witnesses.
Petitioner was represented by Bruce William Slane of the Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., and Respondent was represented by Debra A.
Filteau Begley of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Tina Sylva received a Tdap vaccine on March 11, 2021, and alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a Table injury, claiming the vaccine caused the injury. Respondent denied the Table injury and causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation, which was adopted by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. Petitioner was awarded $12,000.00. The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or the evidence considered beyond the stipulation. The theory of causation is based on the Tdap vaccine being listed on the Vaccine Injury Table for SIRVA. Petitioner was represented by Bruce William Slane, and Respondent by Debra A. Filteau Begley. The decision date was July 29, 2025.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_24-vv-00316