VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-02145 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-02145 Petitioner: Mark Gallo Filed: 2023-12-19 Decided: 2025-05-21 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2023-01-06 Condition: right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 70000 AI-assisted case summary: On December 19, 2023, Mark Gallo filed a petition alleging a right-sided SIRVA after an influenza vaccination administered on January 6, 2023. He alleged residual effects lasting more than six months. Respondent denied Table SIRVA and causation. The public stipulation does not describe Mr. Gallo's specific onset, medical visits, imaging, therapy, injections, or expert opinions. The parties nevertheless stipulated to a negotiated resolution. Chief Special Master Corcoran adopted the stipulation on May 21, 2025 and awarded $70,000.00 as a lump sum through counsel. Theory of causation field: Adult petitioner; influenza vaccine January 6, 2023; alleged right-sided SIRVA. COMPENSATED by stipulation. Respondent denied Table injury and causation; public text lacks detailed clinical chronology. Decision May 21, 2025. Award $70,000.00 lump sum. Petition filed December 19, 2023. Counsel: Jonathan Joseph Svitak, Shannon Law Group. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-02145-0 Date issued/filed: 2025-06-24 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 05/21/2025) regarding 25 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (cr) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:23-vv-02145-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/24/25 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-2145V MARK GALLO, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 21, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Jonathan Joseph Svitak, Shannon Law Group, P.C., Woodridge, IL, for Petitioner. Joseph Douglas Leavitt, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On December 19, 2023, Mark Gallo filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on January 6, 2023. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at May 16, 2025, ¶¶ 1, 2. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States, that he sustained an injury within the time period set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table or that his injury was caused in fact by the vaccination, that he experienced the residual effects of his condition for more than six months, and that there has been no award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his injury. Petition at 1, 6-7; Stipulation at ¶¶ 1-5. Respondent denies that Petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that his current condition is a sequalae of a vaccine-related injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:23-vv-02145-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/24/25 Page 2 of 7 Nevertheless, on May 16, 2025, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,3 stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A lump sum of $70,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 The RSign completed verification located at page six of the parties’ Stipulation has been omitted from the attached copy of the Stipulation. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:23-vv-02145-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/24/25 Page 3 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS MARK GALLO, Petitioner, V. No. 23-2145V (ECF) Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND IDJMAN SERVICES, Respondent. STIPULATION The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters: l. On December 19, 2023, petitioner filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to -34 (the "Program"). The petition seeks compensation for an injury allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of the influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table, 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a) (the "Table"). 2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on January 6, 2023. 3. The vaccine was administered within the United States. 4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered a right-sided SIRVA as a result of his vaccination. Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his alleged injury. ENV39629243-7141-BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC Case 1:23-vv-02145-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/24/25 Page 4 of 7 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that his current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph eight of this Stipulation. 8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment: A lump sum payment of$70,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner's counsel's IOLT A account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition. 10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that the compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis. 2 ENV39629243-7141-BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC Case 1:23-vv-02145-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/24/25 Page 5 of 7 11. Payment made pw-suant to paragraph eight and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph nine of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds. 12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorneys' fees and litigation costs, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa l 5(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g) and (h). 13. In return for the compensation described in paragraphs eight and nine, petitioner, in his individual capacity, and on behalf of his heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, does forever and irrevocably and unconditionally release, acquit, and discharge the United States and the Secretary of Health and Human Services from any and all actions or causes of action (including agreements, judgments, claims, damages, loss of services, expenses, and all demands of whatever kind or nature) that have been brought, could have been brought, or could be timely brought in the Court of Federal Claims, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq., on account of, or in any way growing out of, any and all known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected personal injuries to or death of petitioner resulting from, or alleged to have resulted from, the flu vaccination administered on January 6, 2023, as alleged in a petition for vaccine compensation filed on or about December 19, 2023, in the United States Court of Federal Claims as petition No. 23-2 l 45V. 14. If petitioner should die prior to entry ofj udgment, this agreement shall be voidable upon proper notice to the Court on behalf of either or both of the parties. 15. If the Chief Special Master fails to issue a decision in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation or if the Court of Federal Claims fails to enter judgment in conformity 3 ENV39629243-7141-BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC Case 1:23-vv-02145-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/24/25 Page 6 of 7 with a decision that is in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation, then the parties' settlement and this Stipulation shall be voidable at the sole discretion of either party. 16. This Stipulation expresses a full and complete negotiated settlement of liability and damages claimed under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, expect as otherwise noted in paragraph nine above. There is absolutely no agreement on the part of the parties hereto to make any payment or to do any act or thing other than is herein expressly stated and clearly agreed to. The parties further agree and understand that the award described in this Stipulation may reflect a compromise of the parties' respective positions as to liability and/or amount of damages, and further, that a change in the nature of the injury or condition or in the items of compensation sought, is not grounds to modify or revise this agreement. 17. This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission by the United States or the Secretary of Health and Human Services that the flu vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury or any other injury or his current disabilities, or that petitioner suffered an injury contained in the Vaccine Injury Table. 18. All rights and obligations of petitioner hereunder shall apply equally to petitioner's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and/or assigns. END OF STIPULATION 4 ENV39629243-7141-BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC Case 1:23-vv-02145-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/24/25 Page 7 of 7 Respectfully submitted, PETITIONER: AfiA.1 MARK GALLO ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PETITIONER: OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: ~~~~ JO~ ~ Sh=w G= Deputy Director 6825 Hobson Valley Drive, #101 Torts Branch Woodridge, IL 60517 Civil Division Telephone: (312) 578-9501 U.S. Department of Justice jsvitak@shannonlawgroup.com P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND RESPONDENT: HUMAN SERVICES: ffrey s• Je Digitally signed by Jeffrey S. Beach-S Be ac h -S . Date: 2025.05.05 08:36:02 ·04'00' for CAPT GEORGE REED GRIMES, MD, MPH Director, Division of Injury Compensation Programs Health Systems Bureau Civil Division Health Resources and Services U.S. Department of Justice Administration P.O. Box 146 U.S. Department of Health Benjamin Franklin Station and Human Services Washington, D. C. 20044-0146 5600 Fishers Lane, 08W-25A (202) 616-0515 Rockville, MD 20857 joseph.leavitt@usdoj.gov 5 ENV39629243-7141 •BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-02145-cl-extra-11082713 Date issued/filed: 2025-06-24 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10616125 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-2145V MARK GALLO, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 21, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Jonathan Joseph Svitak, Shannon Law Group, P.C., Woodridge, IL, for Petitioner. Joseph Douglas Leavitt, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1 On December 19, 2023, Mark Gallo filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on January 6, 2023. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at May 16, 2025, ¶¶ 1, 2. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States, that he sustained an injury within the time period set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table or that his injury was caused in fact by the vaccination, that he experienced the residual effects of his condition for more than six months, and that there has been no award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his injury. Petition at 1, 6-7; Stipulation at ¶¶ 1-5. Respondent denies that Petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that his current condition is a sequalae of a vaccine-related injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Nevertheless, on May 16, 2025, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, 3 stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A lump sum of $70,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 The RSign completed verification located at page six of the parties’ Stipulation has been omitted from the attached copy of the Stipulation. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS MARK GALLO, Petitioner, V. No. 23-2145V (ECF) Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND IDJMAN SERVICES, Respondent. STIPULATION The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters: l. On December 19, 2023, petitioner filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to -34 (the "Program"). The petition seeks compensation for an injury allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of the influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table, 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a) (the "Table"). 2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on January 6, 2023. 3. The vaccine was administered within the United States. 4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered a right-sided SIRVA as a result of his vaccination. Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his alleged injury. ENV39629243-7141-BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that his current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph eight of this Stipulation. 8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment: A lump sum payment of$70,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner's counsel's IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition. 10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that the compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis. 2 ENV39629243-7141-BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC 11. Payment made pw-suant to paragraph eight and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph nine of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds. 12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorneys' fees and litigation costs, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- l 5(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g) and (h). 13. In return for the compensation described in paragraphs eight and nine, petitioner, in his individual capacity, and on behalf of his heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, does forever and irrevocably and unconditionally release, acquit, and discharge the United States and the Secretary of Health and Human Services from any and all actions or causes of action (including agreements, judgments, claims, damages, loss of services, expenses, and all demands of whatever kind or nature) that have been brought, could have been brought, or could be timely brought in the Court of Federal Claims, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq., on account of, or in any way growing out of, any and all known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected personal injuries to or death of petitioner resulting from, or alleged to have resulted from, the flu vaccination administered on January 6, 2023, as alleged in a petition for vaccine compensation filed on or about December 19, 2023, in the United States Court of Federal Claims as petition No. 23-2 l 45V. 14. If petitioner should die prior to entry of judgment, this agreement shall be voidable upon proper notice to the Court on behalf of either or both of the parties. 15. If the Chief Special Master fails to issue a decision in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation or if the Court of Federal Claims fails to enter judgment in conformity 3 ENV39629243-7141-BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC with a decision that is in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation, then the parties' settlement and this Stipulation shall be voidable at the sole discretion of either party. 16. This Stipulation expresses a full and complete negotiated settlement of liability and damages claimed under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, expect as otherwise noted in paragraph nine above. There is absolutely no agreement on the part of the parties hereto to make any payment or to do any act or thing other than is herein expressly stated and clearly agreed to. The parties further agree and understand that the award described in this Stipulation may reflect a compromise of the parties' respective positions as to liability and/or amount of damages, and further, that a change in the nature of the injury or condition or in the items of compensation sought, is not grounds to modify or revise this agreement. 17. This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission by the United States or the Secretary of Health and Human Services that the flu vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury or any other injury or his current disabilities, or that petitioner suffered an injury contained in the Vaccine Injury Table. 18. All rights and obligations of petitioner hereunder shall apply equally to petitioner's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and/or assigns. END OF STIPULATION 4 ENV39629243-7141-BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC Respectfully submitted, PETITIONER: AfiA.1 MARK GALLO ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PETITIONER: OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: JO~ S h = w G= ~ ~~~~ Deputy Director 6825 Hobson Valley Drive, #101 Torts Branch Woodridge, IL 60517 Civil Division Telephone: (3 12) 578-9501 U.S. Department of Justice jsvitak@shannonlawgroup.com P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND RESPONDENT: HUMAN SERVICES: Jeffrey s• Digitally signed by Jeffrey S. Beach -S Date: 2025.05.05 Beac h -S . for 08:36:02 ·04'00' CAPT GEORGE REED GRIMES, MD, MPH Director, Division of Injury Compensation Programs Health Systems Bureau Civil Division Health Resources and Services U.S. Department of Justice Administration P.O. Box 146 U.S. Department of Health Benjamin Franklin Station and Human Services Washington, D. C. 20044-0146 5600 Fishers Lane, 08W-25A (202) 616-0515 Rockville, MD 20857 joseph.leavitt@usdoj.gov 5 ENV39629243-7141 •BEAB-8730-BEFD 05/12/2025 20:23 PM UTC ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-02145-cl-extra-11201410 Date issued/filed: 2025-11-12 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10734825 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-2145V MARK GALLO, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 7, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Jonathan Joseph Svitak, Shannon Law Group, P.C., Woodridge, IL, for Petitioner. Joseph Douglas Leavitt, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On December 19, 2023, Mark Gallo filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration following an influenza vaccine he received on January 6, 2023. Petition, ECF No. 1. On May 21, 2025, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. ECF No. 25. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $40,821.71 (representing $39,690.60 in fees plus $1,131.11 in costs). Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed July 11, 2025, ECF No. 30. Furthermore, counsel for Petitioner represents that no personal out-of-pocket expenses were incurred by Petitioner. ECF No. 30 at 2. Respondent reacted to the motion on July 15, 2025, indicating that he is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Response at 2, 4. ECF No. 31. Petitioner filed no reply thereafter. I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request and find a reduction in the amount of fees to be awarded appropriate, for the reasons listed below. ANALYSIS The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Counsel must submit fee requests that include contemporaneous and specific billing records indicating the service performed, the number of hours expended on the service, and the name of the person performing the service. See Savin v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313, 316-18 (2008). Counsel should not include in their fee requests hours that are “excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.” Saxton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). It is “well within the special master’s discretion to reduce the hours to a number that, in [her] experience and judgment, [is] reasonable for the work done.” Id. at 1522. Furthermore, the special master may reduce a fee request sua sponte, apart from objections raised by respondent and without providing a petitioner notice and opportunity to respond. See Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed. Cl. 201, 209 (2009). A special master need not engage in a line-by-line analysis of petitioner’s fee application when reducing fees. Broekelschen v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 102 Fed. Cl. 719, 729 (2011). The petitioner “bears the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and the expenses incurred.” Wasson v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. 482, 484 (1991). The Petitioner “should present adequate proof [of the attorney’s fees and costs sought] at the time of the submission.” Wasson, 24 Cl. Ct. at 484 n.1. Petitioner’s counsel “should make a good faith effort to exclude from a fee request hours that are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary, just as a lawyer in private 2 practice ethically is obligated to exclude such hours from his fee submission.” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434. ATTORNEY FEES I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. The rates requested for work performed by Jonathan Svitak through 2025 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations and will therefore be awarded herein. However, the rates requested for work performed by Nathan Marchese require adjustment. Mr. Marchese was previously awarded a lesser rate than requested herein ($445.00 for work performed in 2025). See Smith v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 24-0748, 2025 WL 2453259 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. July 24, 2025). I find no reason to deviate from that determination and it otherwise is not the practice of OSM to adjust prior rate determinations upward in later cases. See Jefferson v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 19-1882, 2023 WL 387051 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 9, 2023). Accordingly, I reduce attorney Marchese’s rates to be consistent with Smith. Application of the foregoing reduces the fees to be awarded herein by $20.50.3 In addition, it is evidenced in the billing records that numerous tasks performed by the attorneys in this matter are more properly billed using a paralegal rate.4 “Tasks that can be completed by a paralegal or a legal assistant should not be billed at an attorney’s rate.” Riggins v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-382V, 2009 WL 3319818, at *21 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. June 15, 2009). “[T]he rate at which such work is compensated turns not on who ultimately performed the task but instead turns on the nature of the task performed.” Doe/11 v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. XX-XXXXV, 2010 WL 529425, at *9 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 29, 2010). Counsel are admonished that although these billing entries reflect reasonably performed tasks, they must be charged at a reduced rate comparable to that of a paralegal. 3 This amount consists of reducing Nathan Marchese’s rate for 2025 and is calculated as follows: ($450.00 - $445.00 = $5.00 x 4.10 hours billed) = $20.50. 4 Entries considered paralegal in nature include drafting requests for medical records, following up on medical records requests and drafting basic documents such as an exhibit list, PAR questionnaire, notice of filing, notice of intent, statement of completion, cover sheet, joint notice not to seek review. Entries that include paralegal tasks billed at an attorney rate include, but are not limited to, the following: 11/16/2023, 11/21/2023 (five entries), 11/26/2023, 11/30/2023 (two entries), 12/14/2023, 12/19/2023, 2/19/2024 (two entries), 3/20/2024, 5/22/2025. ECF No. 30-2 at 1-24. 3 In evaluating a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, special masters “need not, and indeed should not, become green-eyeshade accountants.” Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments. Here, such an overall percentage cut is reasonable, and preferrable to a time- consuming line-by-line review of the bill. I therefore reduce the total fees to be awarded herein by five percent as a fair adjustment to account for the paralegal duties issue mentioned. Application of the foregoing reduces the total amount of fees to be awarded by $1,984.53.5 ATTORNEY COSTS Petitioner has otherwise provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs. ECF No. 30-4 at 1-8. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or amounts sought. I find the requested costs reasonable and hereby award them in full. CONCLUSION The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT, in part, Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total amount of $38,816.68 (representing $37,685.57 in fees plus $1,131.11 in costs) to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.6 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 5 This amount is calculated as follows: $39,690.60 x 0.05 = $1,984.53. 6 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review. 4