VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-01654 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-01654 Petitioner: Grisel Escalera Filed: 2023-09-26 Decided: 2025-04-23 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2020-10-16 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 107500 AI-assisted case summary: Grisel Escalera filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on September 26, 2023, alleging a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccination on October 16, 2020. The injury was alleged to have persisted for longer than six months. The respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding that Petitioner's injury was consistent with a left-sided SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. The respondent stated that Petitioner had no prior history of left shoulder issues, pain occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, pain was limited to the injection shoulder, and no other condition explained the pain. Based on the respondent's concession and the record, entitlement to compensation was granted on February 11, 2025. Subsequently, on March 20, 2025, the respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, proposing an award of $107,500.00. This amount was comprised of $102,500.00 for pain and suffering and $5,000.00 for lost earnings. Petitioner agreed with the proffered award. On April 23, 2025, the court issued a decision awarding Petitioner the lump sum of $107,500.00, representing compensation for all damages available under the Act. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-01654-0 Date issued/filed: 2025-03-14 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 02/11/2025) regarding 37 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (ppa) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:23-vv-01654-UNJ Document 39 Filed 03/14/25 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1654V GRISEL ESCALERA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: February 11, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Christopher E. Hultquist, Law Office of Christopher E. Hultquist, Esq., for Petitioner. Joseph Douglas Leavitt, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On September 26, 2023, Grisel Escalera filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza vaccination she received on October 16, 2020. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that her vaccine-related injury has persisted for longer than six months. Petition at ¶ 7. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On February 10, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Respondent states that “Petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a left-sided 1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:23-vv-01654-UNJ Document 39 Filed 03/14/25 Page 2 of 2 SIRVCA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, Petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder prior to vaccination; pain occurred within forty-eight hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality had been identified to explain Petitioner’s shoulder pain.” Id. at 4-5. Respondent further agrees that “based on the record as it now stands, Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 5. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-01654-cl-extra-10823311 Date issued/filed: 2025-03-14 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10356723 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1654V GRISEL ESCALERA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: February 11, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Christopher E. Hultquist, Law Office of Christopher E. Hultquist, Esq., for Petitioner. Joseph Douglas Leavitt, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1 On September 26, 2023, Grisel Escalera filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza vaccination she received on October 16, 2020. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that her vaccine-related injury has persisted for longer than six months. Petition at ¶ 7. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On February 10, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Respondent states that “Petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a left-sided 1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). SIRVCA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, Petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder prior to vaccination; pain occurred within forty-eight hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality had been identified to explain Petitioner’s shoulder pain.” Id. at 4-5. Respondent further agrees that “based on the record as it now stands, Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 5. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-01654-1 Date issued/filed: 2025-04-23 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 03/21/2025) regarding 42 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (ppa) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:23-vv-01654-UNJ Document 49 Filed 04/23/25 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1654V GRISEL ESCALERA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: March 21, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Christopher E. Hultquist, Law Office of Christopher E. Hultquist, Esq., Providence, RI, for Petitioner. Joseph Douglas Leavitt, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On September 26, 2023, Grisel Escalera filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza vaccination she received on October 16, 2020. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On February 11, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On March 20, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $107,500.00, comprised of $102,500.00 for pain and suffering and $5,000.00 for lost earnings. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:23-vv-01654-UNJ Document 49 Filed 04/23/25 Page 2 of 5 with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $107,500.00, comprised of $102,500.00 for pain and suffering and $5,000.00 in lost wages, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:23-vv-01654-UNJ Document 49 Filed 04/23/25 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS GRISEL ESCALERA, Petitioner, v. No. 23-1654V (ECF) Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On September 23, 2023, Grisel Escalera (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended, alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from an influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on October 16, 2020. Petition at 1 (ECF No. 1). On February 10, 2025, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed his Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA. ECF No. 35. Accordingly, on February 11, 2025, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner is entitled to vaccine compensation for SIRVA following the influenza vaccine she received on October 16, 2020. ECF No. 37. I. Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $102,500.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. Case 1:23-vv-01654-UNJ Document 49 Filed 04/23/25 Page 4 of 5 B. Lost Earnings Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $5,000.00 in lost earnings. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees. These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through one lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:1 A lump sum payment of $107,500.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. Respectfully submitted, YAAKOV M. ROTH Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Division C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. 2 Case 1:23-vv-01654-UNJ Document 49 Filed 04/23/25 Page 5 of 5 s/Joseph Leavitt JOSEPH LEAVITT Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 T: (202) 616-0515 E: joseph.leavitt@usdoj.gov Dated: March 20, 2025 3 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 4: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-01654-cl-extra-10849536 Date issued/filed: 2025-04-23 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10382948 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1654V GRISEL ESCALERA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: March 21, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Christopher E. Hultquist, Law Office of Christopher E. Hultquist, Esq., Providence, RI, for Petitioner. Joseph Douglas Leavitt, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 On September 26, 2023, Grisel Escalera filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza vaccination she received on October 16, 2020. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On February 11, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On March 20, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $107,500.00, comprised of $102,500.00 for pain and suffering and $5,000.00 for lost earnings. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $107,500.00, comprised of $102,500.00 for pain and suffering and $5,000.00 in lost wages, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS GRISEL ESCALERA, Petitioner, v. No. 23-1654V (ECF) Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On September 23, 2023, Grisel Escalera (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended, alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from an influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on October 16, 2020. Petition at 1 (ECF No. 1). On February 10, 2025, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed his Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA. ECF No. 35. Accordingly, on February 11, 2025, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner is entitled to vaccine compensation for SIRVA following the influenza vaccine she received on October 16, 2020. ECF No. 37. I. Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $102,500.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. B. Lost Earnings Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $5,000.00 in lost earnings. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees. These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through one lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:1 A lump sum payment of $107,500.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. Respectfully submitted, YAAKOV M. ROTH Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Division C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. 2 s/Joseph Leavitt JOSEPH LEAVITT Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 T: (202) 616-0515 E: joseph.leavitt@usdoj.gov Dated: March 20, 2025 3 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 5: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-01654-cl-extra-11117161 Date issued/filed: 2025-08-08 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10650574 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1654V GRISEL ESCALERA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: July 9, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Christopher E. Hultquist, Law Office of Christopher E. Hultquist, Esq., Providence, RI, for Petitioner. Joseph Douglas Leavitt, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On September 26, 2023, Grisel Escalera filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration following an influenza vaccine she received on October 16, 2020. Petition, ECF No. 1. On March 21, 2025, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. ECF No. 42. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $49,592.64 (representing $48,308.00 in fees plus $1,284.64 in costs). Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed March 31, 2025, ECF No. 46. Furthermore, Petitioner filed a signed statement representing that no personal out-of-pocket expenses were incurred. ECF No. 46-4. Respondent reacted to the motion on April 8, 2025, indicating that he is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Motion at 2-4, ECF No. 47. Petitioner indicated thereafter that she does not intend to file a substantive reply. ECF No. 48. I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. The rates requested for work performed through the end of 2024 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations and will therefore be adopted. Petitioner has also requested the hourly rate of $511.00 for 2025 work performed by attorney Christopher E. Hultquist, representing a rate increase of $36.00 from the previous year. I find the proposed rate to be reasonable and hereby award it herein. Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs. ECF No. 46-3 at 2-9. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or amounts sought. I find the requested costs reasonable and hereby award them in full. The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total amount of $49,592.64 (representing $48,308.00 in fees plus $1,284.64 in costs) to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review. 2