Michael Greim v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2024)

Filed 2023-11-26Decided 2024-12-27Vaccine Influenza
entitlement_granted_pending_damages

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Michael Greim filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on September 13, 2023, alleging he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza vaccine on November 9, 2022. Mr.

Greim stated he had no prior history of left shoulder pain, that the pain occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, that the pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder that received the vaccine, that no other condition explained his shoulder pain, and that he suffered residual effects for longer than six months. The respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report on November 25, 2024, conceding that Mr.

Greim had satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation. Based on the respondent's concession and the evidence of record, Chief Special Master Brian H.

Corcoran found Mr. Greim entitled to compensation.

The case was granted entitlement pending a damages decision. The public decision does not describe the specific symptoms, medical tests, treatments, or expert witnesses involved in this case.

Petitioner counsel was William E. Cochran, Jr. of Black McLaren, et al., PC, and respondent counsel was Lauren Kells of the U.S.

Department of Justice.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Michael Greim alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccination on November 9, 2022. The respondent conceded that Petitioner satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran issued a ruling on entitlement on December 27, 2024, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation based on the respondent's concession and the evidence of record. The case was granted entitlement pending a damages decision. The public text does not specify the mechanism of injury, name any experts, or detail the evidence considered beyond the respondent's concession. The theory of causation is based on the Vaccine Injury Table for SIRVA. Petitioner counsel was William E. Cochran, Jr., and respondent counsel was Lauren Kells.

Source PDFs 2 total · 2 downloaded