VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-00635 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-00635 Petitioner: Mikako Welborn Filed: 2023-05-03 Decided: 2024-12-02 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2021-10-20 Condition: Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 115000 AI-assisted case summary: On May 3, 2023, Mikako Welborn filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) resulting from an influenza vaccine received on October 20, 2021. Petitioner stated the vaccine was administered in the United States and that her injury lasted for more than six months. Respondent denied that the flu vaccine caused a SIRVA Table Injury or any other injury. Despite these positions, the parties filed a joint stipulation on October 29, 2024, agreeing to settle the case. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation, awarding Mikako Welborn a lump sum of $115,000.00 for all damages. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages available under Section 15(a) of the Vaccine Act. Petitioner was represented by Daniel Alholm of Alholm Law PC, and Respondent was represented by Adam Nemeth Muffett of the U.S. Department of Justice. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Mikako Welborn received an influenza vaccine on October 20, 2021, and alleged a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) that lasted more than six months. Respondent denied that the vaccine caused a SIRVA Table Injury or any other injury. The parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle the case. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation, awarding Petitioner a lump sum of $115,000.00 for all damages under Section 15(a) of the Vaccine Act. The public decision does not describe the specific medical experts, clinical details of the injury, onset, symptoms, diagnostic tests, treatments, or the precise mechanism of injury. The case was settled via stipulation, and the public text does not specify if a Table theory was pursued or if the settlement reflects a compromise of liability and damages. Petitioner was represented by Daniel Alholm, and Respondent was represented by Adam Nemeth Muffett. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-00635-0 Date issued/filed: 2024-12-02 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/29/2024) regarding 31 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer, Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (ppa) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:23-vv-00635-UNJ Document 39 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-0635V MIKAKO WELBORN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 29, 2024 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Daniel Alholm, Alholm Law PC, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Adam Nemeth Muffett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On May 3, 2023, Mikako Welborn filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on October 20, 2021. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed October 29, 2024, at ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner further alleges that the flu vaccine was administered in the United States, her injury has lasted for more than six months, and neither Petitioner, nor any other party, has ever filed any action for Petitioner’s vaccine-related injury. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 16, 17; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3- 5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table Injury, denies that petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine, and denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner any other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §300aa (2018). Case 1:23-vv-00635-UNJ Document 39 Filed 12/02/24 Page 2 of 7 Nevertheless, on October 29, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A lump sum of $115,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:23-vv-00635-UNJ Document 39 Filed 12/02/24 Page 3 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) MIKA KO WELBORN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 23-635V (ECF) V, ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) SECRETARY OF HEALT H ) AND HUMAN SERVICES. ) ) Rcspon