VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-00116 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-00116 Petitioner: Megan Rogers Filed: 2023-10-23 Decided: 2023-11-22 Vaccine: HPV Vaccination date: 2015-09-08 Condition: Outcome: dismissed Award amount USD: AI-assisted case summary: Megan Rogers filed a petition on October 23, 2023, alleging injury after receiving two doses of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine on September 8, 2015, and January 29, 2016. Because no decision had been issued within the statutory timeframe, Ms. Rogers was notified that she could withdraw her petition or have it remain before the special master. On October 20, 2023, Ms. Rogers elected to withdraw her petition. Her request was granted, and the proceedings on the merits were concluded, with no judgment to be entered. The case was dismissed as a result of the withdrawal. Theory of causation field: unclear Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_23-vv-00116-0 Date issued/filed: 2023-11-22 Pages: 1 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 10/23/2023) regarding 24 Order Concluding Proceedings. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (abs) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:23-vv-00116-UNJ Document 26 Filed 11/22/23 Page 1 of 1 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-116V UNPUBLISHED MEGAN ROGERS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 23, 2023 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1 On January 27, 2023, Megan Rogers filed a petition for compensation the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.2 Petitioner alleged that she suffered injuries after receiving human papillomavirus vaccinations on September 8, 2015, and January 29, 2016. ECF No. 1. Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section 300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On October 20, 2023, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b). In light of Petitioner’s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner’s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.