VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_22-vv-00087 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_22-vv-00087 Petitioner: Melissa Bartlett Filed: 2022-01-28 Decided: 2025-06-11 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2020-10-09 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 25000 AI-assisted case summary: Melissa Bartlett filed a petition on January 28, 2022, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. She alleged that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) resulting from an influenza vaccine received on October 9, 2020. Ms. Bartlett stated that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that she suffered residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that no prior action or compensation had been sought for this injury. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that Ms. Bartlett sustained a SIRVA Table injury, denied that the flu vaccine caused her alleged shoulder injury or any other injury, and denied that her current condition was a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. Despite these denials, the parties filed a joint stipulation on May 8, 2025, agreeing to settle the case. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran reviewed the stipulation and found it reasonable, adopting it as his decision. Pursuant to the stipulation, Ms. Bartlett was awarded a lump sum of $25,000.00, to be paid via ACH deposit to her counsel's IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages available under Section 15(a) of the Vaccine Act. The stipulation also noted that the parties would submit to further proceedings for the award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. The decision was made public as it contained a reasoned explanation. Petitioner's counsel was Jonathan Joseph Svitak of Shannon Law Group, P.C., and respondent's counsel was Felicia Langel, an attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical tests, treatments, or expert witnesses involved in this case. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Melissa Bartlett alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccine received on October 9, 2020. The case proceeded as a Table claim. Respondent denied the alleged SIRVA Table injury and causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle the case. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation, awarding a lump sum of $25,000.00 for all damages under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The stipulation, dated May 8, 2025, and adopted in a decision on June 11, 2025, does not detail the specific mechanism of injury or name any experts. Petitioner was represented by Jonathan Joseph Svitak, and Respondent by Felicia Langel. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_22-vv-00087-0 Date issued/filed: 2025-06-11 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 05/08/2025) regarding 48 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer, ( Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. )(mpj) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:22-vv-00087-UNJ Document 54 Filed 06/11/25 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-0087V MELISSA BARTLETT, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 8, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Jonathan Joseph Svitak, Shannon Law Group, P.C., Woodridge, IL, for Petitioner. Felicia Langel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On January 28, 2022, Melissa Bartlett filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on October 9, 2020. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed May 8, 2025, at ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered in the United States, she has suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and neither Petitioner, nor any other party, has ever filed any action, or received compensation in the form of an award or settlement, for Petitioner’s vaccine-related injury. Petition at ¶¶ 3, 22, 24, 25; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused her alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury or condition; and denies that her current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §300aa (2018). Case 1:22-vv-00087-UNJ Document 54 Filed 06/11/25 Page 2 of 7 Nevertheless, onMay 8, 2025,the parties filed the attachedjoint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A lump sum of $25,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:22-vv-00087-UNJ Document 54 Filed 06/11/25 Page 3 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS MELISSA BARTLETT, Petitioner, No. 22-87V Chief Special Master Corcoran v. ECF SECRETA RY OF HEALT H AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. STIPULATION The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters: 1. Melissa Bartlett ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a) 2. Petitioner received the flu vaccine on October 9, 2020. 3. The vaccine was administered within the United States. 4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table following administration of the flu vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of her alleged injury for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of the alleged injury. ENV99785418-5024-DCEB-3925-0CBC 05/05/202516:41 PM UTC Case 1:22-vv-00087-UNJ Document 54 Filed 06/11/25 Page 4 of 7 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused her alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury or condition; and denies that her cUITent condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation. 8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofj udgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment: A lump sum payment of$25,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner's counsel's IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofj udgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to fwther proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition. 10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Vaccine Program is not primarily liable wider 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis. 2 ENV99785418-5024-DCEB-3925-DCBC 05/05/202516:41 PM UTC Case 1:22-vv-00087-UNJ Document 54 Filed 06/11/25 Page 5 of 7 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds. 12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorney's fees and litigation costs, and past Wl.l'eimbursed expenses, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(a ) and ( d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g) and (h). 13. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 8 and 9, petitioner, in her individual capacity, and on behalf of her heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, does forever irrevocably and unconditionally release, acquit and discharge the United States and the Secretary of Health and Human Services from any and all actions or causes of action (including agreements, judgments, claims, damages, loss of services, expenses and all demands of whatever kind or nature) that have been brought, could have been brought, or could be timely brought in the Court of Federal Claims, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq., on accowit of, or in any way growing out of, any and all known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected personal injuries to or death of petitioner resulting from, or alleged to have resulted from, the flu vaccine administered on October 9, 2020, as alleged in a petition for vaccine compensation fi1ed on or about January 28, 2022, in the United States Court of Federal Claims as petition No. 22-87V. 14. If petitioner should die prior to entry ofj udgment, this agreement shall be voidab]e upon proper notice to the Court on behalf of either or both of the parties. 3 ENV99785418-5024-DCEB-3925-0CBC 05/05/202516:41 PM UTC Case 1:22-vv-00087-UNJ Document 54 Filed 06/11/25 Page 6 of 7 15. If the special master fails to issue a decision in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation or if the Court of Federal Claims fails to enter judgment in confonnity with a decision that is in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation, then the parties' settlement and this Stipulation shall be voidable at the sole discretion of either party. 16. This Stipulation expresses a full and complete negotiated settlement of liability and damages claimed under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, except as otherwise noted in paragraph 9 above. There is absolutely no agreement on the part of the parties hereto to make any payment or to do any act or thing other than is herein expressly stated and clearly agreed to. The parties further agree and understand that the award described in this Stipulation may reflect a compromise of the parties' respective positions as to liability and/or amount of damages, and further, that a change in the narure of the injury or condition or in the items of compensation sought, is not grounds to modify or revise this agreement. 17. This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission by the United States or the Secretary of Health and Human Services that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; that the flu vaccine caused any other injury or condition; or that her current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. 18. All rights and obligations of petitioner hereunder shall apply equally to petitioner's heirs, executors. administrators. successors. and/or assigns. END OF STIPULATION I I I 4 ENV99785418-5024-DCEB-3925-0CBC 05/05/202516:41 PM UTC Case 1:22-vv-00087-UNJ Document 54 Filed 06/11/25 Page 7 of 7 Respectfully submitted, PETITIONER: ~&Jb,tt MELISSA BARTLETT ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PETITIONER: OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: .. ~,~ P~~ HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Je ~ S NNON LAWGROUP,P.C. Deputy Director 3550 Hobson Road Torts Branch Woodridge, IL 60517 Civil Division jsvita.k@shannonlawgroup.com U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR OF THE SECRETARY OF HEAL TH RESPONDENT: AND HUMAN SERVICES: Jeffreys. Digitally signed by Jeffrey S. Beach •S -S Beach Date:2025.04.29 09;26:39 .04•00· for CAPT GEORGE REED GRJMES, MD, MPH FELICIA D. LANGEL Director, Division of Injury Trial Attorney Compensation Programs Torts Branch Health Systems Bureau Civil Division Health Resources and Services U.S. Department of Justice Administration P.O. Box 146 U.S. Department of Health Benjamin Franklin Station and Human Services Washington, DC 20044-0146 5600 Fishers Lane, 08W-25A (202) 305-3148 Rockville, MD 20857 felicia.d.langeJ@usdoj.gov 67 6 ?/,,,;, Dated: --------- 5 ENV99785418-5024-DCEB-3925-DCBC 05/05/202516:41 PM UTC