VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-02152 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-02152 Petitioner: Leonard DiTomaso Filed: 2021-11-09 Decided: 2023-02-28 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2019-12-31 Condition: Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 152836 AI-assisted case summary: Leonard DiTomaso filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on November 9, 2021, alleging Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) resulting from an influenza vaccine received on December 31, 2019. Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding that Petitioner is entitled to compensation, finding that the injury was a Table injury and that there was no evidence of an unrelated factor being a more likely cause. A ruling on entitlement was issued on October 5, 2022, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. On January 19, 2023, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, proposing $150,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,836.87 for past unreimbursable expenses, totaling $152,836.87. Petitioner agreed with the proffered award. The Chief Special Master issued a decision awarding Petitioner a lump sum payment of $152,836.87 on February 28, 2023. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-02152-0 Date issued/filed: 2022-12-05 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 10/05/2022) regarding 23 Ruling on Entitlement, Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (kp) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:21-vv-02152-UNJ Document 28 Filed 12/05/22 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-2152V UNPUBLISHED LEONARD DITOMASO, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 5, 2022 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome Respondent. (GBS) Jessica E. Choper, Britcher Leone, L.L.C., Glen Rock, NJ, for Petitioner. James Vincent Lopez, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On November 9, 2021, Leonard Ditomaso filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS), resulting from the adverse effects of an influenza (flu) vaccination received on December 31, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On September 20, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. It is Respondent’s position that [P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation. Id. at 9. Specifically, 1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:21-vv-02152-UNJ Document 28 Filed 12/05/22 Page 2 of 2 Respondent determined that “[P]etitioner received his vaccination in the United States, that [P]etitioner satisfies the statutory severity requirement by suffering the residual effects or complications of his injury for more than six months after vaccine administration, and there is also no evidence of a factor unrelated that is a more likely cause of [P]etitioner’s injury. Id. Respondent further agrees that the scope of damages to be awarded is limited to Petitioner’s GBS and its related sequelae only. Id. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-02152-1 Date issued/filed: 2023-02-28 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 01/20/2023) regarding 30 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (tlf) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:21-vv-02152-UNJ Document 33 Filed 02/28/23 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-2152V UNPUBLISHED LEONARD DITOMASO, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: January 20, 2023 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain- Barre Syndrome (GBS) Respondent. Jessica E. Choper, Britcher Leone, L.L.C., Glen Rock, NJ, for Petitioner. James Vincent Lopez, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On November 9, 2021, Leonard DiTomaso filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) following the administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on December 31, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On October 5, 2022, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for GBS. On January 19, 2023, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $152,836.87 (comprised of $150,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,836.87 for past unreimbursable expenses). Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees 1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:21-vv-02152-UNJ Document 33 Filed 02/28/23 Page 2 of 5 with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $152,836.87 (comprised of $150,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,836.87 for past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:21-vv-02152-UNJ Document 33 Filed 02/28/23 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ___________________________________ ) LEONARD DITOMASO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 21-2152V v. ) Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On November 9, 2021, Leonard DiTomaso (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that he developed Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on December 31, 2019. On September 20, 2022, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a GBS Table injury, and on October 5, 2022, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF Nos. 21, 23. I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $150,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. Case 1:21-vv-02152-UNJ Document 33 Filed 02/28/23 Page 4 of 5 B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that he incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $2,836.87. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees. These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $152,836.87, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Leonard DiTomaso: $152,836.87 Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2 Case 1:21-vv-02152-UNJ Document 33 Filed 02/28/23 Page 5 of 5 DARRYL R. WISHARD Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s James V. Lopez James V. Lopez Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-3655 Fax: (202) 616-4310 Email: james.lopez@usdoj.gov Date: January 19, 2023 3