VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01889 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01889 Petitioner: Angela Mosley Filed: 2021-09-22 Decided: 2023-11-21 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2018-09-28 Condition: left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 124321 AI-assisted case summary: Angela Mosley filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on September 28, 2018. She further alleged that she suffered residual effects of the injury for more than six months. The respondent conceded that Petitioner is entitled to compensation, finding that her case met the criteria for SIRVA on the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, the respondent noted that her pain occurred within 48 hours after the injection, was limited to the shoulder, and no other condition explained the symptoms. The ruling on entitlement was issued on May 2, 2023. Subsequently, on October 17, 2023, the respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation. The parties agreed to a total award of $124,321.79, which included $115,000.00 for pain and suffering, $126.79 for past unreimbursable expenses, and $9,194.45 to satisfy a State of Oklahoma Medicaid lien. The decision awarding damages was issued on November 21, 2023, and the court ordered the award as stated in the proffer. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01889-0 Date issued/filed: 2023-06-02 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 05/02/2023) regarding 26 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (kle) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:21-vv-01889-UNJ Document 28 Filed 06/02/23 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-1889V UNPUBLISHED ANGELA MOSLEY, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 2, 2023 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Kathleen Margaret Loucks, Lommen Abdo Law Firm, Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner. Madelyn Weeks, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On September 22, 2021, Angela Mosley filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on September 28, 2018. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of the vaccine injury for more than six months. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On May 2, 2023, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the 1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:21-vv-01889-UNJ Document 28 Filed 06/02/23 Page 2 of 2 Vaccine Injury Table (‘Table’) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (‘QAI’) for SIRVA. Specifically, petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder that would explain the alleged signs, symptoms, examination findings, and/or diagnostic studies occurring after vaccine injection; pain occurred within 48 hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain petitioner’s shoulder pain.” Id. at 7-8. Respondent further agrees that “petitioner timely filed her case, that she received the flu vaccine in the United States, and that she satisfies the statutory severity requirement by suffering the residual effects or complications of her injury for more than six months after vaccine administration.” Id. at 8. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01889-1 Date issued/filed: 2023-11-21 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/17/2023) regarding 37 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (kle) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:21-vv-01889-UNJ Document 41 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-1889V ANGELA MOSLEY, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: October 17, 2023 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Kathleen Margaret Loucks, Lommen Abdo Law Firm, Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner. Madelyn Weeks, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On September 22, 2021, Angela Mosley filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on September 28, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On May 2, 2023, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. On October 17, 2023, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded a total of $115,126.79, consisting of $115,000.00 in pain and suffering, and $126.79, in unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. Respondent also proffers that Petitioner should be awarded funds to satisfy the State of Oklahoma Medicaid lien in the amount of $9,194.45. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:21-vv-01889-UNJ Document 41 Filed 11/21/23 Page 2 of 5 Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner the following: A. A lump sum payment of $115,126.79 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner; and B. A lump sum payment of $9,194.45, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Oklahoma Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and: Oklahoma Health Care Authority Attention: Josh Holloway P.O. Drawer 18497 Oklahoma City, OK 73154 Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to the State of Oklahoma for satisfaction of the Medicaid lien. These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:21-vv-01889-UNJ Document 41 Filed 11/21/23 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ANGELA MOSLEY, Petitioner, v. No. 21-1889V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On September 22, 2021, Angela Mosley (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza vaccine she received on September 28, 2018. Petition at 1. On May 1, 2023, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury, and on May 2, 2023, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 25; ECF No. 26. I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $115,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. Case 1:21-vv-01889-UNJ Document 41 Filed 11/21/23 Page 4 of 5 B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $126.79. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees. C. Medicaid Lien Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded funds to satisfy the State of Oklahoma Medicaid lien in the amount of $9,194.45, which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Oklahoma may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the State of Oklahoma has made to or on behalf of petitioner from the date of her eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as a result of her alleged vaccine-related injury suffered on or about September 29, 2018, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through two lump sum payments described below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1 A. A lump sum payment of $115,126.79 in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and B. A lump sum payment of $9,194.45, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Oklahoma Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages. 2 Case 1:21-vv-01889-UNJ Document 41 Filed 11/21/23 Page 5 of 5 and: Oklahoma Health Care Authority Attention: Josh Holloway P.O. Drawer 18497 Oklahoma City, OK 73154 Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to the State of Oklahoma for satisfaction of the Medicaid lien. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division LARA A. ENGLUND Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ MADELYN E. WEEKS MADELYN E. WEEKS Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-3262 madelyn.e.weeks@usdoj.gov Dated: October 17, 2023 3 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01889-cl-extra-10736956 Date issued/filed: 2023-11-21 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10270366 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-1889V ANGELA MOSLEY, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: October 17, 2023 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Kathleen Margaret Loucks, Lommen Abdo Law Firm, Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner. Madelyn Weeks, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On September 22, 2021, Angela Mosley filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on September 28, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On May 2, 2023, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. On October 17, 2023, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded a total of $115,126.79, consisting of $115,000.00 in pain and suffering, and $126.79, in unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. Respondent also proffers that Petitioner should be awarded funds to satisfy the State of Oklahoma Medicaid lien in the amount of $9,194.45. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner the following: A. A lump sum payment of $115,126.79 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner; and B. A lump sum payment of $9,194.45, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Oklahoma Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and: Oklahoma Health Care Authority Attention: Josh Holloway P.O. Drawer 18497 Oklahoma City, OK 73154 Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to the State of Oklahoma for satisfaction of the Medicaid lien. These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ANGELA MOSLEY, Petitioner, v. No. 21-1889V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On September 22, 2021, Angela Mosley (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza vaccine she received on September 28, 2018. Petition at 1. On May 1, 2023, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury, and on May 2, 2023, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 25; ECF No. 26. I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $115,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $126.79. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees. C. Medicaid Lien Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded funds to satisfy the State of Oklahoma Medicaid lien in the amount of $9,194.45, which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Oklahoma may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the State of Oklahoma has made to or on behalf of petitioner from the date of her eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as a result of her alleged vaccine-related injury suffered on or about September 29, 2018, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through two lump sum payments described below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1 A. A lump sum payment of $115,126.79 in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and B. A lump sum payment of $9,194.45, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Oklahoma Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages. 2 and: Oklahoma Health Care Authority Attention: Josh Holloway P.O. Drawer 18497 Oklahoma City, OK 73154 Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to the State of Oklahoma for satisfaction of the Medicaid lien. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division LARA A. ENGLUND Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ MADELYN E. WEEKS MADELYN E. WEEKS Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-3262 madelyn.e.weeks@usdoj.gov Dated: October 17, 2023 3 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 4: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01889-cl-extra-10734545 Date issued/filed: 2024-08-12 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10267955 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-1889V ANGELA MOSLEY, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: July 12, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Kathleen Margaret Loucks, Lommen Abdo Law Firm, Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner. Madelyn Weeks, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On September 22, 2021, Angela Mosley filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered from a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration as a result of an influenza vaccine administered to her on September 28, 2018. Petition at 1. On October 17, 2023, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. ECF No. 37. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inf ormation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If , upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material f rom public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $40,950.58 (representing $35,913.70 in fees plus $5,036.88 in costs). Application for Attorneys’ Fees (“Motion”) filed January 25, 2024, ECF No. 42. Furthermore, Petitioner filed a signed statement representing that she incurred no personal out-of-pocket expenses. Id. at 43. Respondent reacted to the motion on January 26, 2024, indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case, but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Respondent’s Response to Motion at 2-3, 3 n.2, ECF No. 43. Petitioner filed no reply. I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s requests. The hourly rates requested for attorney Kathleen M. Loucks and paralegals for all time billed through the end of 2023 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations and will therefore by awarded herein. For attorney Heidi Torvik, Petitioner requests the hourly rates of $365.00 for time billed in 2023 and $370.00 for 2024, Motion at 6. Ms. Torvik has been a licensed attorney since 2014, placing her in the range of attorneys with 8 - 10 years’ experience based on the OSM Attorneys’ Fee Schedules. Motion at 11. This is the first case setting an hourly rate for Ms. Torvik in the Vaccine Program. I find the requested rates to be reasonable and hereby award them herein. Furthermore, Petitioner requests $5,036.88 in overall costs. Motion at 2. Such costs reflect the expense of obtaining medical records, the Court’s filing fee, Westlaw research and shipping charges. I find the requested costs reasonable and hereby award them in full. CONCLUSION The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I award a total of $40,950.58 (representing $35,913.70 in fees plus $5,036.88 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Kathleen M. Loucks. 2 In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by f iling a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review. 3