VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01479 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01479 Petitioner: Megan Hitchner Filed: 2021-06-16 Decided: 2023-06-27 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2019-10-07 Condition: brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexopathy Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 100000 AI-assisted case summary: Megan Hitchner filed a petition on June 16, 2021, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. She alleged that she sustained brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexopathy as a result of receiving an influenza vaccine on October 7, 2019. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the vaccine caused her condition or any other injury. Despite maintaining their respective positions, the parties reached a stipulation to settle the case. The stipulation provided for a lump sum award of $100,000.00, payable to Ms. Hitchner, to compensate for all damages. Special Master Thomas L. Gowen adopted the stipulation and ordered that judgment be entered in accordance with its terms. The decision was filed on June 27, 2023. The public decision does not describe the onset of symptoms, specific medical tests, treatments, or expert witnesses. Petitioner was represented by Leah VaSahnja Durant of the Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, and respondent was represented by Matthew Murphy of the United States Department of Justice. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Megan Hitchner alleged that she sustained brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexopathy as a result of receiving an influenza vaccine on October 7, 2019. The respondent denied causation. The parties reached a stipulation for settlement, agreeing to an award of $100,000.00 for all damages. Special Master Thomas L. Gowen adopted the stipulation. The public decision does not detail the specific theory of causation, medical experts, or the mechanism of injury. The decision was filed on June 27, 2023. Petitioner's counsel was Leah VaSahnja Durant, and respondent's counsel was Matthew Murphy. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01479-0 Date issued/filed: 2023-07-18 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 6/27/2023) regarding 34 DECISION on Stipulation: Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen. (slw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:21-vv-01479-UNJ Document 38 Filed 07/18/23 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: June 27, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEGAN HITCHNER, * * * Petitioners, * No. 21-1479V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Matthew Murphy, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON STIPULATION1 On June 16, 2021, Megan Hitchner (“petitioner”), filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 (Petition) (ECF No. 1). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving the influenza (“Flu”) vaccine on October 7, 2019, she sustained brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexopathy. Id. On June 27, 2023, respondent filed a stipulation stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 33). Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexopathy, any other injury, or her current condition. Id. at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, maintaining their respective positions, 1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it to a publicly available website. This decision will appear at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc or on the Court of Federal Claims website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the decision is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the decision will be posted on the court’s website without any changes. Id. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (2012) (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereinafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. Case 1:21-vv-01479-UNJ Document 38 Filed 07/18/23 Page 2 of 2 the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between the parties shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding petitioner compensation according to the terms of the stipulation attached here to as Appendix A. Id. at ¶ 7. The stipulation provides: a) A lump sum of $100,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master 3 Entry of judgment is expediated by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a). 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-01479-cl-extra-10748730 Date issued/filed: 2024-11-21 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10282142 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: October 3, 2024 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEGAN HITCHNER, * * Petitioner, * No. 21-1479V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Lara A. Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 On December 13, 2023, Megan Hitchner, (“petitioner”) filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner’s Motion for Attorney Fees (“Fees App.”) (ECF No. 40). For the reasons discussed below, I GRANT Petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and award a total of $35,587.85. I. Procedural History On June 16, 2021, Megan Hitchner (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 (Petition) (ECF No. 1). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving the influenza (“Flu”) vaccine on October 7, 2019, she sustained brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexopathy. Id. On June 27, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation, which I adopted as my decision awarding compensation on that same day. (ECF No. 34). 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018) (Vaccine Act or the Act. All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. On December 13, 2023, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner requests compensation in the total amount of $35,587.85, representing $30,926.60 in attorneys’ fees and $4,661.25 in costs. Fees App. at 1. Pursuant to General Order No. 9, Petitioner warrants she has not personally incurred any costs in pursuit of his claim. Id. at 2. Respondent reacted to the fees motion on December 14, 2023, stating that “Respondent is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case.” Response at 2 (ECF No. 41). Petitioner filed her reply on December 18, 2023, requesting the Court award the fees and costs be awarded in full. (ECF No. 42). The matter is now ripe for adjudication. II. Analysis Under the Vaccine Act, the special master may award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for a petition that does not result in an award of compensation but was filed in good faith and supported by a reasonable basis. § 300aa–15(e)(1). Here, because Petitioner was awarded compensation pursuant to a stipulation, she is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioners “bea[r] the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and the expenses incurred” are reasonable. Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. 482, 484 (1993). Adequate proof of the claimed fees and costs should be presented when the motion is filed. Id. at 484 n. 1. The special master has the discretion to reduce awards sua sponte, independent of enumerated objections from the respondent. Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed. Cl. 201, 208–09 (Fed. Cl. 2009); Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313 (Fed. Cl. 2008), aff'd No. 99–537V, 2008 WL 2066611 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 22, 2008). a. Attorneys’ Fees Petitioner requests the following rates of compensation for his attorneys: for Ms. Leah V. Durant (“LVD”), $380.00 per hour for work performed in 2019, $395.00 per hour for work performed in 2020, $420.00 for work performed in 2021, $441.00 for work performed in 2022, and $463.00 per hour for work performed in 2023; for Mr. Richard Armada (“RA”), $400.00 per hour for work performed in 2021; and for Mr. Christopher Williams (“CW”), $325.00 per hour for work performed in 2021, $341.00 per hour for work performed in 2021, and $358.00 per hour for work performed in 2023. These rates are consistent with what counsel have previously been awarded for their Vaccine Program work and the undersigned finds them to be reasonable herein. Turning next to review of the submitted billing statement, I find that the overall hours spent on this matter appear to be reasonable. The entries are reasonable and accurately describe the work being performed and the length of time it took to perform each task. Respondent did not respond to the fees motion, and thus has not identified any particular entries as being objectionable. Therefore, Petitioner is entitled to final attorneys’ fees of $30,926.60. b. Attorneys’ Costs Like attorneys’ fees, a request for reimbursement of costs must be reasonable. Perreira v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34 (Fed. Cl. 1992). Petitioner requests total 2 attorneys’ costs in the amount of $4,661.25. This amount is comprised of acquiring medical records and review of those records by Mr. Timothy Hancock, postage, and the Court’s filing fee. Fees App. Ex. 2. Petitioner has provided adequate documentation supporting all of her requested costs. Petitioner is therefore awarded the full amount of costs sought. III. Conclusion In accordance with the foregoing, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and find that Petitioner is entitled to a reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs as follows: Attorneys’ Fees Requested $30,926.60 (Reduction of Fees) - Total Attorneys’ Fees Awarded $30,926.60 Attorneys’ Costs Requested $4,661.25 (Reduction of Costs) - Total Attorneys’ Costs Awarded $4,661.25 Total Attorneys’ Fees and Costs $35,587.85 Accordingly, I award the following: a lump sum in the amount of $35,587.85, representing reimbursement for Petitioner’s attorneys’ fees and costs, in the form of a check payable to petitioner and her counsel, Ms. Leah Durant. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance herewith.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master 3 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a). 3