VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00819
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00819
Petitioner: Holly Jenkins
Filed: 2021-01-29
Decided: 2023-07-03
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2020-09-04
Condition: left-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 35225

AI-assisted case summary:
Holly Jenkins filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging she suffered a left-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza vaccine on September 4, 2020. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, conceded that Ms. Jenkins' claim met the Vaccine Injury Table criteria for SIRVA and that she satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation. Based on the respondent's concession and the evidence of record, the Chief Special Master found Ms. Jenkins entitled to compensation. Subsequently, a decision was issued awarding damages. The award included a lump sum of $35,000.00 for pain and suffering and $225.00 for actual unreimbursable expenses, totaling $35,225.00. This amount was intended to compensate for all damages available under the Act. The petition was filed on January 29, 2021, and the decision awarding damages was issued on July 3, 2023.

Theory of causation field:
Table

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00819-0
Date issued/filed: 2023-08-07
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 07/03/2023) regarding 29 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (kle) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:21-vv-00819-UNJ Document 34 Filed 08/07/23 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 21-0819V
HOLLY JENKINS, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner,
v. Filed: July 3, 2023
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
Petitioner.
Nina Ren, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On January 29, 2021, Holly Jenkins (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2
(the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left-sided shoulder injury related
to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine
administered on September 4, 2020. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special
Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On July 3, 2023, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer in
which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s
Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that Petitioner’s claim
meets the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) criteria for SIRVA. Id. at 3 (citing 42 C.F.R. §§
1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of
2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).

Case 1:21-vv-00819-UNJ Document 34 Filed 08/07/23 Page 2 of 2
100.3(a)(XIV)(B), (c)(10)). Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal
prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id. (citing Section 13(a)(1)(B); Section
11(c)(1)(D)(i)).
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00819-1
Date issued/filed: 2023-08-07
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/03/2023) regarding 30 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (kle) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:21-vv-00819-UNJ Document 35 Filed 08/07/23 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 21-0819V
HOLLY JENKINS, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner,
v. Filed: July 3, 2023
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
Petitioner.
Nina Ren, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
On January 29, 2021, Holly Jenkins (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2
(the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left-sided shoulder injury related
to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine
administered on September 4, 2020. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special
Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On July 3, 2023, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer in
which he conceded that Petitioner was entitled to compensation for a Table SIRVA.
Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 1, 3. That same day, I issued a Ruling on
Entitlement.
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of
2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In
accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other
information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I
agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).

Case 1:21-vv-00819-UNJ Document 35 Filed 08/07/23 Page 2 of 2
Respondent represents that Petitioner agrees to his proffer on an award of
compensation. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 3-4. Based on the record as
a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer,3 I award
the following compensation:
A lump sum of $35,225.00 (representing $35,000.00 for pain and suffering,
and $225.00 for actual unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to
Petitioner. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 3-4. This amount represents
compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Because the combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer contains information regarding Petitioner’s personal
medical history, which is not generally included in a Proffer when separately filed, it is not attached hereto.
4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2