Charles Baine v. HHS - Influenza, right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2024)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Charles Baine filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on January 12, 2021, alleging he suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) from an influenza vaccine received on or about November 19, 2019. He further alleged that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that he experienced residual effects of his condition for more than six months, and that there had been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf.
The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that Mr. Baine sustained a SIRVA Table injury, denied that the vaccine caused his alleged shoulder injury or any other injury, and denied that his current condition was a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.
The parties subsequently filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle the case. Chief Special Master Brian H.
Corcoran reviewed the stipulation and found it reasonable, adopting it as his decision. Pursuant to the stipulation, Mr.
Baine was awarded $22,000.00 as compensation for all items of damages available under Section 15(a). This amount represents a compromise of the parties' respective positions on liability and damages.
The decision was issued on February 26, 2024. Petitioner was represented by Bridget Candace McCullough of Muller Brazil, LLP, and respondent was represented by Julianna Rose Kober of the U.S.
Department of Justice.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Charles Baine alleged a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) from an influenza vaccine received on November 19, 2019. The respondent denied the alleged SIRVA Table injury and causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle the case, and Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation as his decision. The stipulation states that the parties maintain their positions regarding liability and causation but agree to settle. The award of $22,000.00 represents compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and reflects a compromise of the parties' respective positions. The public decision does not describe the specific medical mechanism, expert testimony, or detailed clinical facts supporting the alleged injury or the settlement terms beyond the agreed-upon compensation amount. The theory of causation is based on the Vaccine Injury Table. The decision date was February 26, 2024. Petitioner's counsel was Bridget Candace McCullough, and respondent's counsel was Julianna Rose Kober.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00612