VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00373 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00373 Petitioner: Kimberly Robichaux Filed: 2021-01-08 Decided: 2023-06-08 Vaccine: Tdap Vaccination date: 2019-04-10 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 134867 AI-assisted case summary: Kimberly Robichaux filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program alleging she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) from a Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) vaccine she received on April 10, 2019. She alleged the vaccine was administered in the United States, her injury lasted longer than six months, and she had not received prior compensation for the injury. The respondent conceded that Ms. Robichaux was entitled to compensation, agreeing that she met the criteria for SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation. The respondent also confirmed that the case was timely filed, the vaccine was administered in the U.S., and the injury met the statutory severity requirement of lasting more than six months. Based on the respondent's concession and the evidence of record, the Chief Special Master found Ms. Robichaux entitled to compensation. Subsequently, the parties reached a proffer agreement for an award of compensation. The decision awarded Ms. Robichaux a lump sum payment of $134,867.76, consisting of $130,000.00 for past pain and suffering and $4,867.76 for out-of-pocket expenses, representing all damages available under the program. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00373-0 Date issued/filed: 2023-04-25 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 03/20/2023) regarding 26 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (nh) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:21-vv-00373-UNJ Document 29 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0373V UNPUBLISHED KIMBERLY ROBICHAUX, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: March 20, 2023 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Respondent. Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Joseph Adam Lewis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On January 8, 2021, Kimberly Robichaux filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from adverse effects of a Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine received on April 10, 2019. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges the vaccine was administered in the United States, her injury lasted longer than six months, and neither Petitioner nor any other party has ever received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for her vaccine-related injury. Petition at ¶¶ 4-5; Exs. 1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:21-vv-00373-UNJ Document 29 Filed 04/25/23 Page 2 of 2 1; 12 at 472. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On March 20, 2023, Respondent filed his response to Petitioner’s motion for a ruling on the record and Rule 4(c) report (ECF No. 25) in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 2. Specifically, Respondent agrees that “petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”) for SIRVA.” Id. at 9. Respondent further agrees that “the records show that petitioner timely filed her case, that she received the Tdap vaccine in the United States, and that she satisfies the statutory severity requirement by suffering the residual effects or complications of her injury for more than six months after vaccine administration.” Id. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00373-1 Date issued/filed: 2023-06-08 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 05/08/2023) regarding 31 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer, Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (nh) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:21-vv-00373-UNJ Document 35 Filed 06/08/23 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0373V UNPUBLISHED KIMBERLY ROBICHAUX, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 8, 2023 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder Respondent. Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Joseph Adam Lewis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On January 8, 2021, Kimberly Robichaux filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from adverse effects of a Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine received on April 10, 2019. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges the vaccine was administered in the United States, her injury lasted longer than six months, and neither Petitioner nor any other party has ever received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for her vaccine-related injury. Petition at ¶¶ 4-5; Exs. 1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:21-vv-00373-UNJ Document 35 Filed 06/08/23 Page 2 of 5 1; 12 at 472. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On March 20, 2023, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On May 8, 2023, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $134,867.76. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $134,867.76 (consisting of $130,000.00 for past pain and suffering and $4,867.76 for out of pocket expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:21-vv-00373-UNJ Document 35 Filed 06/08/23 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ___________________________________ ) KIMBERLY ROBICHAUX, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 21-373V ECF ) v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________ ) PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION1 I. Procedural History On January 8, 2021, Kimberly Robichaux (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to - 34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine she received on April 10, 2019. Petition (“Pet”) at 1. On September 22, 2022, petitioner filed a motion for ruling on the record. ECF No. 22. On March 20, 2023, respondent filed a memorandum that served as both his responsive report in accordance with Vaccine Rule 4(c) and his response to petitioner’s motion for ruling on the record, concluding that petitioner suffered from SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table, within the Table timeframe. ECF No. 25. The same day, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 26. 1 This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued. Case 1:21-vv-00373-UNJ Document 35 Filed 06/08/23 Page 4 of 5 II. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded a lump sum of $134,867.76, consisting of $130,000.00 for past pain and suffering and $4,867.76 for out-of-pocket expenses. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. III. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment, as described below, and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: A lump sum payment of $134,867.76 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.2 Petitioner agrees. Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. 2 Case 1:21-vv-00373-UNJ Document 35 Filed 06/08/23 Page 5 of 5 s/ Joseph A. Lewis JOSEPH A. LEWIS Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 T: (202) 451-7495 E: joseph.a.lewis@usdoj.gov DATED: May 8, 2023 3