VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00359 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00359 Petitioner: Erik Vangsness Filed: 2021-01-08 Decided: 2024-07-19 Vaccine: Tdap Vaccination date: 2018-07-09 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) and brachial neuritis (BN) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 42500 AI-assisted case summary: Erik Vangsness filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on January 8, 2021, alleging he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving a Tdap vaccine on July 9, 2018. He later amended his petition on April 25, 2022, to also allege brachial neuritis (BN) from the same vaccine. The Tdap vaccine is listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. Mr. Vangsness alleged that the vaccination was administered within the United States and that he experienced residual effects of the SIRVA for more than six months. He also represented that neither he nor any other party had filed a civil action or received compensation for the alleged vaccine-caused injuries. The Respondent denied that the Tdap vaccine caused Mr. Vangsness's alleged brachial neuritis, previously alleged SIRVA, or any other injury or current condition. The parties, maintaining their respective positions, reached a joint stipulation to settle the case, agreeing that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran reviewed the stipulation and found it reasonable, adopting it as his decision. Pursuant to the stipulation, Mr. Vangsness was awarded a lump sum of $42,500.00, payable to him, as compensation for all items of damages. The decision was filed on July 19, 2024. Petitioner was represented by John Robert Howie of Howie Law, PC, and Respondent was represented by Mark Kim Hellie of the U.S. Department of Justice. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Erik Vangsness alleged injury from a Tdap vaccine received on July 9, 2018. The initial petition alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA), a condition listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. An amended petition alleged brachial neuritis (BN) from the same vaccine. Respondent denied causation for both alleged injuries. The parties reached a joint stipulation to settle the case, agreeing to an award of $42,500.00. The stipulation does not detail specific medical experts, clinical findings, or a mechanism of injury beyond the general allegations of SIRVA and BN. The decision, issued by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran on July 19, 2024, adopted the stipulation as the award. Petitioner was represented by John Robert Howie, and Respondent by Mark Kim Hellie. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00359-0 Date issued/filed: 2024-07-19 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 06/18/2024) regarding 43 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (kle) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:21-vv-00359-UNJ Document 50 Filed 07/19/24 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0359V ERIK VANGSNESS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: June 18, 2024 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner. Mark Kim Hellie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On January 8, 2021, Erik Vangsness filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”), alleging that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving a tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine on July 9, 2018. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 24-25. On April 25, 2022, Petitioner filed an amended petition, alleging that he suffered brachial neuritis (“BN”) after receiving the Tdap vaccine. Amended Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 26; Stipulation, filed June 12, 2024, ¶¶ 1- 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccine within the United States, that he suffered the residual effects of the SIRVA for more than six months, and that neither he nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for the SIRVA, alleged as vaccine caused. Petition at ¶¶ 1, 24-25, 27; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the Tdap vaccine caused [P]etitioner alleged BN, previously-alleged SIRVA, any other injury, or his current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:21-vv-00359-UNJ Document 50 Filed 07/19/24 Page 2 of 7 Nevertheless, on June 12, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A lump sum of $42,500.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:21-vv-00359-UNJ Document 50 Filed 07/19/24 Page 3 of 7 Jf n tbe fflniteb ~tates