VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00088
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00088
Petitioner: Terra Figueiredo
Filed: 2021-01-05
Decided: 2022-10-03
Vaccine: Tdap
Vaccination date: 2019-11-10
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 81193

AI-assisted case summary:
Terra Figueiredo filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on January 5, 2021, alleging she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving a Tdap vaccine on November 10, 2019. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit. Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report on June 13, 2022, conceding that Petitioner's claim met the Table criteria for SIRVA and that she was entitled to compensation. A ruling on entitlement was issued on June 16, 2022. On September 1, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, proposing an award of $81,193.04, consisting of $80,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,193.04 for past unreimbursable expenses. Petitioner, a competent adult, agreed with the proffered award. The Chief Special Master issued a decision awarding Petitioner the lump sum of $81,193.04 on October 3, 2022.

Theory of causation field:
Table

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00088-0
Date issued/filed: 2022-07-18
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 06/16/2022) regarding 29 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (ke) Service on parties made. (ew).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:21-vv-00088-UNJ Document 31 Filed 07/18/22 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 21-0088V
UNPUBLISHED
TERRA FIGUEIREDO, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: June 16, 2022
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria
acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine;
Respondent. Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)
John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.
Naseem Kourosh, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On January 5, 2021, Terra Figueiredo filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table Injury, after receiving the tetanus, diphtheria,
acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine on November 10, 2019. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 6. On
January 31, 2021, Petitioner filed a more detailed, amended petition, alleging the same.
Amended Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 22. Petitioner further alleged that she received the
vaccination in the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her SIRVA for
more than six months, and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil action or
1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:21-vv-00088-UNJ Document 31 Filed 07/18/22 Page 2 of 2
received compensation for her SIRVA. Id. at ¶¶ 1, 20-21. The case was assigned to the
Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On June 13, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
Specifically, Respondent “had concluded that [P]etitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria
for SIRVA.” Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that “[P]etitioner has satisfied all legal
prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_21-vv-00088-1
Date issued/filed: 2022-10-03
Pages: 4
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 09/01/2022) regarding 36 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (kle) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:21-vv-00088-UNJ Document 43 Filed 10/03/22 Page 1 of 4
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 21-0088V
UNPUBLISHED
TERRA FIGUEIREDO, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: September 1, 2022
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus Diphtheria acellular
Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder
Respondent. Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)
John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.
Naseem Kourosh, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On January 5, 2021, Terra Figueiredo filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table Injury, after receiving the tetanus, diphtheria,
acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine on November 10, 2019. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 6. The
case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On June 16, 2022, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to
compensation for her SIRVA. On September 1, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on award
of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $81,193.04,
representing compensation in the amounts of $80,000.00 for her pain and suffering and
1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:21-vv-00088-UNJ Document 43 Filed 10/03/22 Page 2 of 4
$1,193.04 for her past unreimbursed expenses. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent
represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a
whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
sum payment of $81,193.04, representing compensation in the amounts of
$80,000.00 for her pain and suffering and $1,193.04 for her actual unreimbursable
expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents
compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:21-vv-00088-UNJ Document 43 Filed 10/03/22 Page 3 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
TERRA FIGUEIREDO,
Petitioner,
No. 21-88V (ECF)
v.
Chief Special Master Corcoran
SECRETARY OF HEALTH
AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On January 5, 2021, Terra Figueiredo (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2018)
(the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a left-sided shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration as a result of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine. ECF No. 1
(Petition) at 1.
On June 13, 2022, respondent filed a report conceding that compensation under the
Vaccine Act is appropriate in this case. ECF No. 28.
On June 16, 2022, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that
petitioner is entitled to compensation. ECF No. 29. On the same date, the Chief Special Master
issued a Damages Order. ECF No. 30.
I. Items of Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
$81,193.04, consisting of $80,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,193.04 for past unreimbursed
expenses, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled
under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

Case 1:21-vv-00088-UNJ Document 43 Filed 10/03/22 Page 4 of 4
II. Form of the Award
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner be made through a lump
sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the
Court’s judgment award the following: a lump sum payment of $81,193.04, in the form of a
check payable to petitioner.1
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN M. BOYNTON
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
LARA A. ENGLUND
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/ Naseem Kourosh
NASEEM KOUROSH
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Telephone: (202) 305-1159
E-mail: Naseem.Kourosh@usdoj.gov
DATED: September 1, 2022
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.
2