Raymond Cronin v. HHS - Influenza, left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2022)

Filed 2021-01-04Decided 2022-08-01Vaccine Influenza
compensated$15,000

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Raymond Cronin filed a petition for vaccine compensation on January 4, 2021, alleging a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza and Prevnar 13 vaccine on September 11, 2019. He claimed this was a defined Table injury and that he experienced residual effects for more than six months.

The respondent denied that Mr. Cronin sustained a SIRVA Table injury or that the vaccines caused his alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury, and denied that his current condition was a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

Despite these differing positions, the parties reached a joint stipulation to settle the case and award compensation. Chief Special Master Brian H.

Corcoran reviewed the stipulation, found it reasonable, and adopted it as his decision. Pursuant to the stipulation, Mr.

Cronin was awarded a lump sum of $15,000.00, payable to him, representing compensation for all items of damages available under Section 15(a) of the Vaccine Act. The decision was entered on August 1, 2022.

Petitioner was represented by Jimmy A. Zgheib of Zgheib Sayad, P.C., and the respondent was represented by Amanda Pasciuto, an attorney with the U.S.

Department of Justice. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical tests, or treatments received by Mr.

Cronin, nor does it name any medical experts.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Raymond Cronin alleged a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving influenza and Prevnar 13 vaccines on September 11, 2019, claiming it was a defined Table injury with residual effects lasting over six months. Respondent denied the SIRVA Table injury and causation. The parties reached a joint stipulation to settle the case. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation, awarding a lump sum of $15,000.00 to Petitioner. The public text does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or the specific medical evidence considered, but indicates the award represents compensation for all damages under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The decision date was August 1, 2022. Petitioner's counsel was Jimmy A. Zgheib, and respondent's counsel was Amanda Pasciuto.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded