Scott Southerland v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2023)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
On December 28, 2020, Scott Southerland filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) from an influenza vaccine received on November 17, 2018. Petitioner stated the vaccine was administered in the United States, that he experienced residual effects of the injury for more than six months, and that there had been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages related to his condition.
The respondent denied that the petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury, denied that the vaccine caused the alleged shoulder injury or any other injury, and denied that his current condition was a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. Despite these positions, the parties reached a joint stipulation for settlement on May 1, 2023.
Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran reviewed the stipulation and found it reasonable, adopting it as his decision.
Pursuant to the stipulation, Mr. Southerland was awarded a lump sum of $12,500.00, payable by check to the petitioner, as compensation for all items of damages available under Section 15(a) of the Vaccine Act.
This amount represents a compromise of the parties' respective positions on liability and damages. The decision was issued on June 6, 2023.
Petitioner was represented by Scott William Rooney of Nemes, Rooney P.C., and the respondent was represented by Emily H. Manoso of the U.S.
Department of Justice.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Scott Southerland alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) from an influenza vaccine received on November 17, 2018. Respondent denied that the injury was a SIRVA Table injury or that the vaccine caused the alleged injury. The parties reached a joint stipulation for settlement, agreeing to an award of $12,500.00. The Special Master adopted the stipulation. The public decision does not describe the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or detailed clinical facts. The award represents a compromise of the parties' positions. The decision was issued by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran on June 6, 2023. Petitioner's counsel was Scott William Rooney, and respondent's counsel was Emily H. Manoso.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01972