VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01957 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01957 Petitioner: Tanner Nadeau Filed: 2020-12-23 Decided: 2022-12-07 Vaccine: Tetanus-Diphtheria (TD) Vaccination date: 2018-09-02 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 55000 AI-assisted case summary: Tanner Nadeau filed a petition for compensation on December 23, 2020, alleging he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving a tetanus-diphtheria (TD) vaccination on September 2, 2018. The petition stated that the vaccination was administered in the United States, symptoms lasted over six months, and no prior compensation or civil action had occurred. Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report on September 6, 2022, conceding that Tanner Nadeau was entitled to compensation, finding that the injury met the criteria for a Table SIRVA following a TD vaccination. The respondent confirmed that Tanner had no prior shoulder issues, pain occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, symptoms were limited to the vaccinated shoulder, and no other condition explained the symptoms. A ruling on entitlement was issued on September 21, 2022, finding Tanner entitled to compensation. On October 20, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer agreeing to an award of $55,000.00, which Petitioner accepted. The decision awarding damages was issued on December 7, 2022, granting Tanner Nadeau a lump sum payment of $55,000.00. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01957-0 Date issued/filed: 2022-11-03 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 09/21/2022) regarding 22 Ruling on Entitlement, Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (kp) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-01957-UNJ Document 29 Filed 11/03/22 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-1957V UNPUBLISHED TANNER NADEAU, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: September 21, 2022 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Tetanus-Diphtheria (TD) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Respondent. Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Jerome A. Konkel, Samster, Konkel & Safran, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Petitioner. Tyler King, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On December 23, 2020, Tanner Nadeau filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving the tetanus-diphtheria (TD) vaccination on September 2, 2018. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccination was administered within the United States, he experienced symptoms in excess of six months from the date of vaccination, and he has not received any compensation in the form of an award or settlement for his vaccine-related injuries nor had he filed a civil action prior to filing his petition. Petition at 1, 8. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:20-vv-01957-UNJ Document 29 Filed 11/03/22 Page 2 of 2 On September 6, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Respondent found that Petitioner “satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table (‘Table’) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation for a Table SIRVA following a Td vaccination.” Id. at 4. Specifically, Respondent determined that “[P]etitioner had no history of pain or dysfunction in his left shoulder prior to receiving the Td vaccine; pain occurred within 48 hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; the pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality would explain petitioner’s symptoms. In addition, given the medical records outlined above, the statutory six-month sequelae requirement has been satisfied.” Id. Respondent further agrees that that the scope of damages to be awarded is limited to Petitioner’s left shoulder injury and its related sequelae only. Id. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01957-1 Date issued/filed: 2022-12-07 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/20/2022) regarding 25 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (kp) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-01957-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/07/22 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-1957V UNPUBLISHED TANNER NADEAU, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 20, 2022 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus-Diphtheria (TD) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Jerome A. Konkel, Samster, Konkel & Safran, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Petitioner. Tyler King, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On December 23, 2020, Tanner Nadeau filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving the tetanus-diphtheria (TD) vaccination on September 2, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On September 21, 2022, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On October 20, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded a lump sum of $55,000.00. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees 1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:20-vv-01957-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/07/22 Page 2 of 5 with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $55,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:20-vv-01957-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/07/22 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS TANNER NADEAU, Petitioner, v. No. 20-1957V Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION1 I. Procedural History On December 23, 2020, Tanner Nadeau (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34, as amended. He alleges that he sustained a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, within the Table time period following administration of a Tetanus Diphtheria vaccine he received on September 2, 2018. See Petition. On September 6, 2022, respondent filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 20. On September 21, 2022, the Chief Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 22. 1 This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued. Case 1:20-vv-01957-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/07/22 Page 4 of 5 II. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded a lump sum of $55,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. III. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following2: a lump sum payment of $55,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. IV. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Tanner Nadeau: $55,000.00 Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C.SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division TRACI R. PATTON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and suffering. Case 1:20-vv-01957-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/07/22 Page 5 of 5 s/ Tyler C. King TYLER C. KING Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-0730 Tyler.King@usdoj.gov Dated: October 20, 2022