VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01828 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01828 Petitioner: Deana Medina Filed: 2020-12-11 Decided: 2023-10-02 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2019-10-17 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 65000 AI-assisted case summary: Deana Medina filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on December 11, 2020, alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on October 17, 2019. She stated that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that her injury had residual effects for more than six months, and that she had not received any prior award or settlement for this condition. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that Petitioner sustained a shoulder injury as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, denied that the vaccine caused her injury, and denied that her current condition was a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury. Despite these denials, the parties filed a joint stipulation on August 28, 2023, agreeing that compensation should be awarded. Chief Special Master Corcoran found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision awarding damages. The court awarded Deana Medina a lump sum of $65,000.00, representing compensation for all items of damages available under Section 15(a) of the Vaccine Act. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01828-0 Date issued/filed: 2023-10-02 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 08/30/2023) regarding 63 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (tlf) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-01828-UNJ Document 67 Filed 10/02/23 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-1828V DEANA MEDINA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 30, 2023 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner. Julia Marter Collison, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On December 11, 2020, Deana Medina filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 17, 2019. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at August 28, 2023, ¶¶ 1, 2. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States, that she experienced the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award of settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of her alleged condition. Petition at 1-2; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. Respondent denies that Petitioner sustained a shoulder injury as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table; denies that the vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that her current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:20-vv-01828-UNJ Document 67 Filed 10/02/23 Page 2 of 7 Nevertheless, on August 28, 2023, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A lump sum of $65,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:20-vv-01828-UNJ Document 67 Filed 10/02/23 Page 3 of 7 Case 1:20-vv-01828-UNJ Document 67 Filed 10/02/23 Page 4 of 7 Case 1:20-vv-01828-UNJ Document 67 Filed 10/02/23 Page 5 of 7 Case 1:20-vv-01828-UNJ Document 67 Filed 10/02/23 Page 6 of 7 Case 1:20-vv-01828-UNJ Document 67 Filed 10/02/23 Page 7 of 7 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01828-cl-extra-10735335 Date issued/filed: 2024-05-13 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10268745 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-1828V DEANA MEDINA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: April 11, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner. Julia Marter Collison, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On December 11, 2020, Deana Medina filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on October 17, 2019. Petition, ECF No. 1. On August 30, 2023, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. ECF No. 63. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inf ormation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If , upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material f rom public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section ref erences to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $31,315.17 (representing $30,141.90 in fees plus $1,173.27 in costs). Application for Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed Feb. 20, 2024, ECF No. 68. Furthermore, Petitioner filed a signed statement representing that Petitioner incurred $318.25 3 in personal out-of- pocket expenses. ECF No. 69. Respondent reacted to the motion on Feb. 26, 2024, reporting that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case, but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Respondent’s Response to Motion at 2-3, ECF No. 70. Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter. The attorney hourly rates requested for work performed through the end of 2023 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations, and will therefore be adopted. Petitioner has also requested the same 2023 attorney rate of $500 per hour for work performed by Ronald Homer in 2024. ECF No. 68 at 27. Additionally, Petitioner requests an hourly rate of $185 for paralegal work. Id. I find these hourly rates to be reasonable, and will award the attorney’s fees requested. And all time billed to the matter was also reasonably incurred. Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs. Motion at 31-63. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or amounts sought. The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I award a total amount of $31,633.37 4 as follows: • A lump sum of $31,315.17, representing reimbursement for fees and costs, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel Ronald C. Homer, and • A lump sum of $318.20, representing reimbursement for Petitioner’s costs, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. 3 Petitioner requests $318.25 in personal out-of -pocket expenses. However, the records ref lect that Petitioner incurred $318.20 in personal out-of -pocket expenses. See ECF No. 68 at 57-63. Thus, Petitioner will be awarded $318.20. 4 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as f ees f or legal services rendered. Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991). 2 In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this Decision. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 5 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by f iling a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review. 3