VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01683
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01683
Petitioner: CHARLES EDWARDS
Filed: 2021-02-05
Decided: 2021-03-02
Vaccine: pneumococcal
Vaccination date: 2017-11-29
Condition: 
Outcome: dismissed
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
Charles Edwards filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on February 5, 2021, alleging an adverse reaction to a pneumococcal vaccination received on November 29, 2017. However, Mr. Edwards subsequently filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, acknowledging that this case was a duplicate of an earlier filed case, no. 20-1682V. In light of this notice, the case was dismissed without prejudice. No medical condition or injury was adjudicated.

Theory of causation field:
unclear

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01683-0
Date issued/filed: 2021-03-02
Pages: 1
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER (Originally filed: 2/5/2021) regarding 9 Order Concluding Proceedings. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (abs) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:20-vv-01683-UNJ Document 10 Filed 03/02/21 Page 1 of 1
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 20-1683V
UNPUBLISHED
CHARLES EDWARDS, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: February 5, 2021
v.
Voluntary dismissal; Order
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND concluding proceedings; duplicate
HUMAN SERVICES, petition.
Respondent.
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
On November 24, 2020, Charles Edwards filed a petition for compensation under
the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through
34.2 Petitioner alleged that he suffered an adverse reaction to a pneumococcal
vaccination that he received on November 29, 2017. Petition at 1. On February 5, 2021,
Petitioner filed a notice of voluntary dismissal acknowledging that this case was a
duplicate of an earlier filed case (no. 20-1682V).3
In light of Petitioner’s “notice of dismissal at any time before service of
respondent’s report” pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), this case is dismissed without
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United
States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available
to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition,
I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012).
3 While Petitioner’s docket entry indicates that he is seeking dismissal pursuant to “Rule 41(a)”
(presumably Court of Federal Claims Rule 41(a)), the more applicable authority is Vaccine Rule 21(a).