David Carl Letner v. HHS - Influenza, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (2021)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
David Carl Letner, pro se, filed a petition on November 6, 2020, alleging that an influenza vaccine received in "Nov.-Dec. 2012" caused him to contract Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) in "Jan. 2013." He sought evaluation and treatment for his illness. Petitioner's submissions included a record from the Bureau of Prisons indicating he received a flu vaccine on November 5, 2012.
Petitioner also stated in a handwritten note that this vaccination caused him to be admitted to Heartland Medical Hospital on December 5, 2012. The respondent moved to dismiss the case, arguing it was untimely filed.
Respondent cited 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-16(a)(2), which requires claims for Table injuries to be filed within 36 months of the first symptom's onset. Respondent also noted that under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-16(b), Petitioner had until March 21, 2019, to file his petition, accounting for potential Table revisions.
Based on Petitioner's statements that he received the vaccine in November 2012 and experienced symptom onset in December 2012 or January 2013, Special Master Herbrina Sanders agreed that the November 6, 2020 petition was significantly past the filing deadline. Consequently, the case was dismissed as untimely.
The Clerk was ordered to enter judgment accordingly. Petitioner was represented by David C.
Letner, pro se. Respondent was represented by Adriana R.
Teitel. The decision was issued by Special Master Herbrina Sanders.
Theory of causation
Petitioner David Carl Letner alleged that an influenza vaccine administered on November 5, 2012, caused Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) with onset in January 2013. The respondent moved to dismiss, asserting the petition was untimely filed under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-16(a)(2), which requires filing within 36 months of the first symptom or manifestation of onset. The Special Master found that the alleged vaccine date of November 2012 and symptom onset in December 2012 or January 2013 made the November 6, 2020 petition untimely. The case was dismissed as untimely. The public decision does not describe the specific mechanism of causation, expert testimony, or award details, as the case was dismissed on procedural grounds.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01584