VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01030 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01030 Petitioner: Helena Johnson Filed: 2020-11-17 Decided: 2023-12-12 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2017-10-09 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: entitlement_granted_pending_damages Award amount USD: AI-assisted case summary: Helena Johnson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on August 17, 2020, alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on October 9, 2017. In an amended petition filed on October 22, 2020, Ms. Johnson alleged, in the alternative, a Table injury of brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexus, or a Table SIRVA. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed an amended report on November 13, 2023, conceding that the Petitioner is entitled to compensation. The respondent stated that the Petitioner's alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table and that she suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. Based on the respondent's concession and a review of the record, Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey found Petitioner entitled to compensation. The matter will now proceed to the damages phase. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, diagnostic tests, treatments, or expert witnesses. David John Carney represented the Petitioner, and Catherine Elizabeth Stolar represented the Respondent. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Helena Johnson filed a petition alleging a SIRVA or, in the alternative, brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexus as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on October 9, 2017. The Respondent conceded entitlement, stating the alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table and that Petitioner suffered residual effects for more than six months. Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey found Petitioner entitled to compensation based on the Respondent's concession and a review of the record. The matter will proceed to the damages phase. The public decision does not specify the mechanism of injury or name any experts. Petitioner was represented by David John Carney, and Respondent was represented by Catherine Elizabeth Stolar. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01030-0 Date issued/filed: 2023-12-12 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC RULING (Originally filed: 11/17/2023) regarding 74 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (kis) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-01030-UNJ Document 77 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 17, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HELENA JOHNSON, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 20-1030V * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Table Injury; Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. * Administration (“SIRVA”). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner. Catherine Elizabeth Stolar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On August 17, 2020, Helena Johnson (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”)2 alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 9, 2017. Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 1). On October 22, 2020, Petitioner filed an amended petition alleging that her October 9, 2017 flu vaccination caused her to develop the “Table injury of brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexus” or, in the alternative, a Table SIRVA. Amended (“Am.”) Petition at 1, 6 (ECF No. 14). 1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018). All citations in this Ruling to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa. 1 Case 1:20-vv-01030-UNJ Document 77 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 On November 13, 2023, Respondent filed an amended Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Am. Respondent’s Report (“Resp. Rept.”) at 2. Based on a review of the record, Respondent states that “[P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 9. Further, based on the medical records, “[P]etitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months.” Id. Therefore, “[P]etitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 9-10. A special master may determine whether a petitioner is entitled to compensation based upon the record. A hearing is not required. § 300aa-13; Vaccine Rule 8(d). In light of Respondent’s concession and a review of the record, the undersigned finds Petitioner is entitled to compensation. This matter will now proceed to the damages phase. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01030-cl-extra-10736762 Date issued/filed: 2023-12-12 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10270172 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 17, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HELENA JOHNSON, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 20-1030V * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Table Injury; Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. * Administration (“SIRVA”). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner. Catherine Elizabeth Stolar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On August 17, 2020, Helena Johnson (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”)2 alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 9, 2017. Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 1). On October 22, 2020, Petitioner filed an amended petition alleging that her October 9, 2017 flu vaccination caused her to develop the “Table injury of brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexus” or, in the alternative, a Table SIRVA. Amended (“Am.”) Petition at 1, 6 (ECF No. 14). 1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018). All citations in this Ruling to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa. 1 On November 13, 2023, Respondent filed an amended Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Am. Respondent’s Report (“Resp. Rept.”) at 2. Based on a review of the record, Respondent states that “[P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 9. Further, based on the medical records, “[P]etitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months.” Id. Therefore, “[P]etitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 9-10. A special master may determine whether a petitioner is entitled to compensation based upon the record. A hearing is not required. § 300aa-13; Vaccine Rule 8(d). In light of Respondent’s concession and a review of the record, the undersigned finds Petitioner is entitled to compensation. This matter will now proceed to the damages phase. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01030-1 Date issued/filed: 2024-01-16 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 12/20/2023) regarding 81 DECISION Proffer. Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (kis) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-01030-UNJ Document 85 Filed 01/16/24 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: December 20, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HELENA JOHNSON, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 20-1030V * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages Award; Table Injury AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. * Administration (“SIRVA”). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner. Catherine Elizabeth Stolar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES BASED ON PROFFER1 On August 17, 2020, Helena Johnson (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”)2 alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 9, 2017. Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 1). On October 22, 2020, Petitioner filed an amended petition alleging that her October 9, 2017 flu vaccination caused her to develop the “Table injury of brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexus” or, in the alternative, a Table SIRVA. Amended (“Am.”) Petition at 1, 6 (ECF No. 14). 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018). All citations in this Ruling to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa. 1 Case 1:20-vv-01030-UNJ Document 85 Filed 01/16/24 Page 2 of 5 On November 17, 2023, the undersigned issued a ruling finding Petitioner entitled to compensation based on Respondent’s concession that Petitioner suffered a Table SIRVA. Ruling on Entitlement dated Nov. 17, 2022 (ECF No. 74); see also Respondent’s Am. Report (ECF No. 73) (conceding entitlement); Damages Order dated Nov. 17, 2023 (ECF No. 75). On December 19, 2023, Respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation (“Proffer”), attached hereto as Appendix A. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Proffer at 2. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards Petitioner: A lump sum payment of $71,785.29, representing $70,000.00 for pain and suffering, and $1,785.29 for past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 2. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which Petitioner is entitled under § 15(a). In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:20-vv-01030-UNJ Document 85 Filed 01/16/24 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) HELENA JOHNSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 20-1030V v. ) Special Master Dorsey ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On August 17, 2020, Helena Johnson (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that she received on October 9, 2017.1 ECF No. 1 at 1. On November 13, 2023, respondent filed an Amended Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case was appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a Table SIRVA. ECF No. 73. On November 17, 2023, the Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation based on respondent’s concession that petitioner suffered from a Table SIRVA. ECF No. 74. 1 On October 20, 2020, petitioner filed an amended petition, in which she alleged that she “suffered a Table Injury of brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexus” as a result of her vaccination. ECF No. 14 at 1. At the same time, petitioner alleged, albeit in the alternative, that the flu vaccine caused her to suffer a Table SIRVA. See id. at 6. The Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to develop brachial neuritis, an injury of the brachial plexus, or any other injury or condition besides a Table SIRVA. See ECF No. 73 at 9-10. Case 1:20-vv-01030-UNJ Document 85 Filed 01/16/24 Page 4 of 5 I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,785.29. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees. The above amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following2: a lump sum payment of $71,785.29, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Helena Johnson: $71,785.29 Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2 Case 1:20-vv-01030-UNJ Document 85 Filed 01/16/24 Page 5 of 5 C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division DARRYL R. WISHARD Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Catherine E. Stolar CATHERINE E. STOLAR Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel.: (202) 353-3299 Fax: (202) 616-4310 Email: catherine.stolar@usdoj.gov DATED: December 19, 2023 3 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 4: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-01030-cl-extra-10736475 Date issued/filed: 2024-01-16 Pages: 1 Docket text: Supplementary opinion from CourtListener cluster 10269885 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: December 20, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HELENA JOHNSON, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 20-1030V * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages Award; Table Injury AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. * Administration (“SIRVA”). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner. Catherine Elizabeth Stolar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES BASED ON PROFFER1 On August 17, 2020, Helena Johnson (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”)2 alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 9, 2017. Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 1). On October 22, 2020, Petitioner filed an amended petition alleging that her October 9, 2017 flu vaccination caused her to develop the “Table injury of brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexus” or, in the alternative, a Table SIRVA. Amended (“Am.”) Petition at 1, 6 (ECF No. 14). 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018). All citations in this Ruling to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa. 1 On November 17, 2023, the undersigned issued a ruling finding Petitioner entitled to compensation based on Respondent’s concession that Petitioner suffered a Table SIRVA. Ruling on Entitlement dated Nov. 17, 2022 (ECF No. 74); see also Respondent’s Am. Report (ECF No. 73) (conceding entitlement); Damages Order dated Nov. 17, 2023 (ECF No. 75). On December 19, 2023, Respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation (“Proffer”), attached hereto as Appendix A. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Proffer at 2. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards Petitioner: A lump sum payment of $71,785.29, representing $70,000.00 for pain and suffering, and $1,785.29 for past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 2. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which Petitioner is entitled under § 15(a). In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) HELENA JOHNSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 20-1030V v. ) Special Master Dorsey ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On August 17, 2020, Helena Johnson (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that she received on October 9, 2017.1 ECF No. 1 at 1. On November 13, 2023, respondent filed an Amended Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case was appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a Table SIRVA. ECF No. 73. On November 17, 2023, the Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation based on respondent’s concession that petitioner suffered from a Table SIRVA. ECF No. 74. 1 On October 20, 2020, petitioner filed an amended petition, in which she alleged that she “suffered a Table Injury of brachial neuritis and/or brachial plexus” as a result of her vaccination. ECF No. 14 at 1. At the same time, petitioner alleged, albeit in the alternative, that the flu vaccine caused her to suffer a Table SIRVA. See id. at 6. The Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to develop brachial neuritis, an injury of the brachial plexus, or any other injury or condition besides a Table SIRVA. See ECF No. 73 at 9-10. I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,785.29. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees. The above amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following2: a lump sum payment of $71,785.29, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Helena Johnson: $71,785.29 Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2 C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division DARRYL R. WISHARD Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Catherine E. Stolar CATHERINE E. STOLAR Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel.: (202) 353-3299 Fax: (202) 616-4310 Email: catherine.stolar@usdoj.gov DATED: December 19, 2023 3