VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00797 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00797 Petitioner: Keri H. Daigle Filed: 2020-06-30 Decided: 2022-04-22 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2019-09-30 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 70000 AI-assisted case summary: Keri H. Daigle filed a petition on June 30, 2020, alleging she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza vaccine on September 30, 2019. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) report on December 6, 2021, conceding that Petitioner's claim met the Table criteria for SIRVA and that she was entitled to compensation. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran issued a ruling on entitlement on December 6, 2021, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. On March 22, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on an award of compensation, which Petitioner agreed to. Chief Special Master Corcoran awarded Petitioner a lump sum payment of $70,000.00 for pain and suffering, representing all damages available under Section 15(a) of the Vaccine Act. Judgment was entered in accordance with this decision. Petitioner was represented by Glen Howard Sturtevant, Jr. of Rawls Law Group, and Respondent was represented by Emilie Williams of the U.S. Department of Justice. The public decision does not describe the specific onset, symptoms, medical tests, treatments, or expert witnesses involved in this case. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Keri H. Daigle alleged a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccine administered on September 30, 2019. The Respondent conceded that the claim met the Table criteria for SIRVA. The case was decided based on a proffer of compensation. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran issued a ruling on entitlement on December 6, 2021, and a decision awarding damages on April 22, 2022. Petitioner was awarded a lump sum of $70,000.00 for pain and suffering, representing all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner was represented by Glen Howard Sturtevant, Jr. (Rawls Law Group), and Respondent was represented by Emilie Williams (U.S. Department of Justice). Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00797-0 Date issued/filed: 2022-01-06 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 12/06/2021) regarding 34 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-00797-UNJ Document 36 Filed 01/06/22 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0797V KERI H. DAIGLE, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: December 6, 2021 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Special Processing Unit (SPU); HUMAN SERVICES, Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu); Respondent. Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA). Glen Howard Sturtevant, Jr., Rawls Law Group (Richmond), Richmond, VA, for Petitioner. Emilie Williams, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On June 30, 2020, Keri H. Daigle filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on September 30, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On December 6, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report 1 Because this unpublished opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the opinion will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:20-vv-00797-UNJ Document 36 Filed 01/06/22 Page 2 of 2 (ECF No. 33) at 1. Specifically, Respondent concludes that Petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA. Id. at 5 (citing 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a), (c)(10)). In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00797-1 Date issued/filed: 2022-04-22 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 03/22/2022) regarding 41 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer, Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-00797-UNJ Document 47 Filed 04/22/22 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0797V UNPUBLISHED KERI H. DAIGLE, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: March 22, 2022 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Special Processing Unit (SPU); HUMAN SERVICES, Damages Decision based on Proffer; Influenza (Flu); Shoulder Injury Respondent. Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA). Glen Howard Sturtevant, Jr., Rawls Law Group (Richmond), Richmond, VA, for Petitioner. Emilie Williams, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On June 30, 2020, Keri H. Daigle filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on September 30, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On December 6, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for a Table SIRVA. On March 22, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on an award of compensation (“Proffer”). In the Proffer, Respondent represented 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:20-vv-00797-UNJ Document 47 Filed 04/22/22 Page 2 of 5 that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:20-vv-00797-UNJ Document 47 Filed 04/22/22 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) KERI H. DAIGLE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 20-797V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On June 30, 2020, Keri H. Daigle (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza vaccine she received on September 30, 2019. Petition at 1. On December 6, 2021, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury, and on that same date, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 33; ECF No. 34. I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. Case 1:20-vv-00797-UNJ Document 47 Filed 04/22/22 Page 4 of 5 This amounts represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $70,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Keri H. Daigle: $70,000.00 Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division TRACI R. PATTON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2 Case 1:20-vv-00797-UNJ Document 47 Filed 04/22/22 Page 5 of 5 /s/ Emilie F. Williams EMILIE F. WILLIAMS Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-0124 Emilie.williams@usdoj.gov DATED: March 22, 2022 3